Scott Ford

Born in Denver

Scott Ford 4 days, 11 hours ago on Which potential police station building site do you prefer?

A bit of background. At the June 17th City Council meeting possible locations for the police station were discussed. The following 7 sites were discussed. Site 1: 9th and Yampa remodel; Site 2: 9th and Yampa new building; Site 3: 8th and Yampa; Site 4: Fox Creek; Site 5: 10th and Lincoln; Site 6: Highway 40; Site 7: Pine Grove & Central Park Drive. Council members Connell and Kounovsky stepped down because of possible conflicts of interest in the sites being discussed that evening.
At the end of a lengthy and at times spirited discussion council member Reisman made a motion that only sites 4, 6 & 7 be considered going forward. This motion was seconded by Magill. When the vote was taken Magill, Myller and Reisman voted YES. Macys and Ford voted NO.
One never says never – however – City Council voted on June 17th to direct staff to look going forward ONLY at sites out of downtown. It is highly unlikely that the current City Council will consider reopening a site discussion that includes any downtown location. I feel that the battle to keep the police station downtown has been fought and lost. I did my best.
(Although I am a member of City Council my opinions are my own and may not be those shared by fellow council members.)

0

Scott Ford 1 week, 3 days ago on Colby Townsend: Deciding to shop local

I will admit that after reading this editorial I am conflicted. Every year as the holiday season approaches there are various appeals to shop local. I understand the sentiment. However, I contend that the local population does shop local. We shop local because we buy the vast majority of our groceries locally. We also purchase our household supplies ranging from dishwasher soap to batteries at the same stores we buy groceries.
I struggle that sales tax is collected on groceries. This simply means that for every $100 a family spends on groceries $4.75 is collected for City, School District and Winter Air Service. Collecting sales tax on groceries is a prime example of the worst kind of regressive taxation. In addition, the population that lives immediately outside of the city limits and yet buy groceries locally has a very limited voice in how that sales tax is spent.
(Although I am a member of City Council my opinions are my own and may not be those shared by my fellow council members.)

0

Scott Ford 1 week, 5 days ago on Steamboat hits its mark with Pro Challenge

The City’s contribution of $50,000 of tax payers’ monies to the USA Pro Challenge Committee is only a part of funds the committee will be using to host this event. I think it is a reasonable expectation of the tax paying citizenry to know if this $50,000 made a difference.

I would like to stop guessing about local economic impact. I am confident with a little effort and “brain-power” a measurement methodology can be developed and agreed upon by all locally involved parties that can be used not only for the USA Pro Challenge but for other special events that will be hosted in Steamboat Springs next summer. The biggest challenge associated in developing an agreed to measurement methodology is not to make it so complex that it is not done.

Personally I am glad that Steamboat Springs is getting another opportunity to showcase the town. Does this increase awareness result in more “visitors” coming to town over the next 1 to 2 years either domestic or foreign? Likely yes, however, almost impossible to measure. I can live with that.

I spend my working hours “hip-deep” in all sorts of demographic/economic data. I have taped to my computer monitor a quote attributed to Albert Einstein that states, “Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.” This helps me keep perspective.

(Although I am a member of City Council, my opinions are my own and may not be shared by fellow members.)

0

Scott Ford 1 month ago on Chamber still working to grow number of summer visitors recommending Steamboat to their friends

Hi Michael – You ask some great questions and I have some answers with a dose of perspective.
I would agree with you that there is a shift taking place with the demographics of the summer visitor. The visitor is becoming older. According to summer market research done by RRC and Associates for the Chamber in 2006 the average age was 42.3. Eight years later in 2014 the average age is now 49.2. About 34% of the summer visitors in 2014 were age 55 or older. . In addition, the average summer visitor is more affluent. In 2014 over a third of the summer visitors had a household income greater than $150K. When we consider that during the summer months 40% of the visitors are from Colorado and the median family income in Colorado was just over $72,000 a Steamboat Springs summer vacation that involves staying in paid lodging may only be affordable to the top 20% of families in Colorado.
In both 2013 & 2014 about 40% of the Summer Visitors had also come to Steamboat Springs during the winter. In 2014 of the folks coming to Steamboat Springs in the summer about 40% were first time summer season visitors and 60% repeat visitors.

Now a dose of my perspective - I am all for making some much needed infrastructure improvements downtown. The current sidewalk situation on both Yampa and Oak can only be described as a hodgepodge of missing connections. It’s goofy!
The cost of providing pedestrian lighting and sidewalks on Oak Street is about $1 million. The cost of the Yampa Street pedestrian promenade and lighting is about $1.2 million. Sidewalks along the side streets would be about another $1 million. Add another $2 million to make all the street crossings ADA and grade compliant the total cost is over $5 million. Is this a lot of money? Yes. Is this doable? Yes. It is simply a matter of City Council setting priorities. For example, $7 million has been set aside for a future police station. Does the priority of a new police station trump downtown infrastructure improvements? Another approach Council could consider would be dedicating all or a portion of future sales tax revenues in the event of a surplus to these downtown infrastructure projects.

In addition, nothing says all these improvements need to be done in one year. I would welcome seeing a phased approached. Right now the only option being discussed for these infrastructure improvements is a Downtown URA and Tax Increment Financing. This is an all or nothing approach. To put it simply City Council is being told by staff that without a URA the infrastructure proposed for downtown will not happen. There are other ways to fund these infrastructure improvements without the “baggage” associated with a URA. (Although I am a member of City Council my opinions are my own and may not be shared by my fellow council members.)

0

Scott Ford 1 month, 1 week ago on Chamber still working to grow number of summer visitors recommending Steamboat to their friends

Good Morning Scott W –

A point of clarification the $660K in in the “community support” budget approved by City Council and to be given to Steamboat Springs Chamber Resort Association in the 2015 budget is for Summer Marketing. The Ski Corp has the primary responsibility to market the winter. There are no dollars in the City’s budget for winter marketing beyond a small amount for promoting Howelsen Hill. This $660K ear marked for Summer Marketing does not cause me a great deal of heart burn because these funds have their roots in the vendor fee. A business that collects state sales tax is allowed to withhold 3.3% from the total tax due as compensation for administering the sales tax properly, keeping the records and remitting the funds timely.

The City of Steamboat Springs does not have a “vendor fee” hold back on its sales tax because it collects its own portion of the sales tax due.
At some point in the 1980’s an amount equivalent to the vendor fee was viewed as a source for summer marketing funds. In addition, there was a time that the City would match these funds Since the mid 1990’s the City no longer does this practice. The projected sales tax collection in the 2015 budget is about $20 million. The vendor fee equivalent would be about $660K.

(Although I am a member of City Council my opinions are my own and may not reflect those of other council members.)

0

Scott Ford 1 month, 1 week ago on Chamber still working to grow number of summer visitors recommending Steamboat to their friends

Hi Pat – There is essentially no way to measure with any degree of certainty the number of people that an amenity such as a new mountain bike trail or a Yampa Street mini-park along the river brought to town. The Chamber research done by RRC & Associates does capture what was the primary motivator for coming to Steamboat Springs. In 2013 5% indicated that it was biking (this would include both mountain and road). In 2014 that number was 4%. I think it would be safe to say that about 5% of visitors to Steamboat Springs indicated that biking, in all its forms, was the primary motivator. I can acknowledge that biking is the primary motivator for the 5% of the visitors to town, however, we need to know how many visitors came in total before the 5% is meaningful.
(Although I am a member of City Council my opinions are my own and may not reflect those of other council members.)

0

Scott Ford 1 month, 1 week ago on Chamber still working to grow number of summer visitors recommending Steamboat to their friends

The Steamboat Springs Chamber Resort Association (SSCRA) Marketing Committee is measuring what is relatively easy to measure at this point. For example, increase in general sales tax, increases in Accommodation Tax collections and occupancy rates over the previous year. Beyond these three measurements SSCRA is primarily measuring activities associated with various marketing strategies. For example, increases in web page visits, expansion of social media outlets, the number of trade shows attended, number of times Steamboat Springs was featured in the national press, etc. To be fair to all concerned I do not think in the past SSCRA has been asked to provide more detailed measurements beyond those listed. I know that going forward I will be asking for more.

I would like to see measurements that focus less on “activities” and more on “achievements”. For example increases/decreases in the number of visitors staying in paid lodging, longer or shorter lengths of stay, increases/declines in average spending by visitors.

When I have asked in the past how many visitors came to town during the summer we become a wee-bit flummoxed by this question. There is no need to be because I think we have all the pieces necessary to answer this question. It involves using the summer research done by RRC Associates and city tax collection data. These two sources simply need to be put together.

I was very encouraged following a meeting I had with Jim Clark, the new Chamber Executive Vice President. He understands the importance of measurements that focus on the desired outcome. (Although I am a member of City Council my opinions are my own and may not reflect those of other council members.)

0

Scott Ford 1 month, 1 week ago on Failure of tax poised to impact future of downtown Steamboat infrastructure improvements

The estimated number of 500 eligible voters within the Downtown Business Improvement District was just a wild guess that was stated by the BID Board at the “Open House” which occurred on September 29th. That is when it became clear to me that this BID election is not like any other election we are familiar with. The regulations associated with a BID elections are so different and involved that the Routt County Clerk’s office declined to administer the election. Who is eligible and who is not is a bit of a mind puzzle to figure out. Once this is figured out submitting the correct paper work to get a ballot was a hoop jumping contest. Kudos to Tracy Barnett of Mainstreet Steamboat. She worked hard with the Denver law firm administering this bid election to communicate a very complex eligibility election process. If it had not been for Tracy’s communication efforts the number of votes cast would have likely been much lower.

The 2007 BID election failed by 6 votes. Seven years later there were a total of 255 votes, about twice the number cast in the 2007 election. This time BID failed by 15. What this tells me is that enough those who have businesses downtown and would be impacted by an increase in property taxes have said, “No Thank You!” Twice! Simply put they do not see how the increase in Property Taxes would benefit their business. Without question some do, however, a majority of those that voted did not. The results of two elections should be a clear message to City Council about how the businesses of downtown feel about increasing taxes to be used for maintenance, beautification, marketing and administration. A NO Thank You; (Twice) should be message enough. (Agreed?)

(Although I am a member of City Council my opinions are my own and may not be shared by other council members.)

0

Scott Ford 1 month, 1 week ago on Downtown Steamboat Springs stakeholders narrowly reject proposal to fund BID with property tax

The estimated number of 500 eligible voters within the Downtown Business Improvement District was just a wild guess that was stated by the BID Board at the “Open House” which occurred on September 29th. That is when it became clear to me that this BID election is not like any other election we are familiar with.

The regulations associated with a BID elections are so different and involved that the Routt County Clerk’s office declined to administer the election. Who is eligible and who is not is a bit of a mind puzzle to figure out. Once this is figured out submitting the correct paper work to get a ballot was a hoop jumping contest.

Kudos to Tracy Barnett of Mainstreet Steamboat. She worked hard with the Denver law firm administering this bid election to communicate a very complex eligibility election process. If it had not been for Tracy’s communication efforts the number of votes cast would have likely been much lower.

The 2007 BID election failed by 6 votes. Seven years later there were a total of 255 votes, about twice the number cast in the 2007 election. This time BID failed by 15. What this tells me is that enough those who have businesses downtown and would be impacted by an increase in property taxes have said, “No Thank You!” Twice! Simply put they do not see how the increase in Property Taxes would benefit their business. Without question some do, however, a majority of those that voted did not.

The results of two elections should be a clear message to City Council about how the businesses of downtown feel about increasing taxes to be used for maintenance, beautification, marketing and administration. A NO Thank You; (Twice) should be message enough. (Agreed?)

(Although I am a member of City Council my opinions are my own and may not be shared by other council members.)

0

Prev