Jump to content
It would be interesting reporting to explore exactly who moved the police station from a low priority to the top priority.
In my view the police station question and the $$ involved there get overly complicated when mixed with other agendas. Helping Big Agnes, revitalizing Yampa St, resolving the Iron Horse Inn, and now this mixing with a YVRMC venture. When taxpayers see added moving parts, it is easier to doubt the benefits. Personally I feel the economy is still weak, and would not be spending so much of our reserves. This will exacerbate our needs in other areas going forward.
Great job Rodger. Thanks. Also another thanks to Nancy Stahoviak. She did great work as Routt County, on behalf of domestic water wells around Milner, faced incredible pressure from Quicksilver Resources AND the State of Colorado, in the Spring of 2012.
Good to see the State is now bringing better standards of practice to Colorado.
Thank you Routt County for having the airport study done. Great step for better utilizing this critical asset and providing better air service to Routt county residents and businesses.
Good letter George. I thought this was being done?
Future budgets are best viewed as extensions to past budget history. That is how you graph a proper review of our fiscal state. In that budget style, graphs indicate consistency or shifts in policy and policy effects. That is how you can say which city council did good or bad for Steamboat's fiscal health.
Obviously taking different angle snapshots of the budget over time is only marginally useful. We should have a 40 year set of budget data.
The 2004 Tax Policy Advisory Board had smart CFO's from successful large corporations as members. They helped identify the data needed and it was then presented by staff in a very easy to digest array of tables showing the previous decades of budgets. I was a fiscal rookie and the presentation made sense to me. Not sure if the more recent TPAB went where the first one did, data wise. There were certainly different politics affecting the two groups. I would suggest members of those TPABs identify their best data and it be carried forward. Subsequent tax review boards should pick up on those trends, and add their own data interests to the whole to be carried forward.
The street corner lot now owned by the hospital is not the one carrying community housing fund obligations. That would be the other lot discussed above - a Barn Village lot adjacent to the hospital that was set aside to meet the affordable housing obligation of the Barn Village subdivision.
I was on city planning commission then. If I recall correctly the hospital traded a needed road access easement in the new subdivision in exchange for engaging itself in the subdivision's AH obligation and thus this parcel. I'm guessing the hospital later opted for the payment in lieu option and later still defaulted on its PIL. That must be the foreclosure.
Hard to figure if a foreclosure in this case would be for the parcel or the PIL obligation, or both, but that step seems to be done. Either way you are right - the foreclosure proceeds are community housing fund property, and not part of the city's general fund.
On a positive note, work sessions like Scott suggests would help the communication with all 7 councilors, which seems to be part of the problem. But work sessions do not resolve problems like councilors learning about real estate negotiations months after they begin.
I agree with the column, but I think Rob is too hard on Hinsvark. A city manager goes where the council majority, or its president speaking on their behalf, wants her to go. The premise that real estate negotiations and other events are resulting from "poor communication" makes no sense to me.
The missing sidewalks represent a hazard.
If only the city spent a fraction of the effort on our sidewalks that they have invested in the police station. It is frustrating to see so little city interest and responsibility for such basic and obviously lacking infrastructure. We built our 50 feet of Oak St sidewalk 14 years ago. People still have to walk in the street to get to us because the corner lots have no sidewalk. Something needs to be done.
Lat year I got a quote from one of the bigger contractors on doing large portions of sidewalk. Then I counted the gaps in sidewalk on Oak St. It would take about $350,000 to finish Oak St's sidewalks. (That doesn't get across the two creeks, but neither does it allow for many sidewalks already owed but not built, per past development permits on Oak St.) The city is spending $300,00 just PLANNING for the next police station. Oak St could use a little love too.
Accommodation Tax funds cannot and should not be spent on downtown sidewalks.
Before the election, the Pilot online poll had 42% in favor of 2A. The actual vote was closer to 70% in favor. Not sure what these online polls amount to. Interesting though, how the poll's options have veered from the 5 trail project areas.
The 2A election guide and coverage for trails matched the ballot text, all saying the trails would be "in and around" Steamboat Springs. That's a lot of latitude. I hope they invest in those 5 project areas. It may even be a multi-year decision process for spending the trails $$ of 2A? In the same 2A election guide and coverage, I think Yampa St committed itself to buying the park property.
I hope the outcome of this process better resembles the promise of the original Trails Proposal. The proposal's 5 project areas:
Buffalo Pass Trail System,
Emerald Mountain Trail System,
Mad Creek Trail System,
Rabbit Ears Pass Trail System, and
Town Pathways and Amenities.
That is the list that inspired the International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA) to hold it's World Summit here this summer. New and better trails taking us into our incredible summer forests are the investment that will draw and attach visitors to Steamboat. This $5 million should build new forest trails through Buffalo Pass, Rabbit Ears, and Mad Creek. Not new pavement downtown.
I'm surprised you disagree. Criticism from a bystander carries a different weight than criticism from an opposing candidate. You can't assume every reader knows you are a candidate. Seems you would want them to know?
I'm used to seeing the Pilot provide free equal column space and also market rate advertising space to candidates.
Last login: Friday, September 19, 2014
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2014 Steamboat Pilot & Today. All rights reserved.