Jump to content
Chris, The time for understanding has long expired, the coup has to be dealt with first.
It seems very presumptive to seize control of the board on the first day after being elected. I suspect that Huron is representing a well planned group. If she had served and paid her dues this might not seem so abrasive.
ln this article it indicates that all the minority groups will lose out. The likes of Jim and Nancy have set themselves up as intermediaries for these groups. Suppose that I am a member of one of these groups. I sure don't want some do gooders pulling my weight, I have enough pride to speak for myself. But if I succumb to their "need to be needed" disorder then my pride will be lost and I will gladly stand in line for my bowl of porridge. But then let's suppose that I wander off the reservation and reject their largesse, then how will I be treated? If the wetbacks coming across the Rio Grande were not reliable voters the river would run red with their blood.
The last election and ensuing coup took place in a stealth environment, maybe next time we can decide with information available. This is a big pile of money in taxes and seemingly very few have any interest. When the teachers union is involved history shows that their wellbeing is the main event.
In todays society we seem to vote to be more permissive when given a choice. Sometimes the chickens come home to roost.
Even Maureen Dowd says good riddance to the Clintons.
This problem at the school board is HUGE and gets very little attention. Look at the amount of money involved here and we have the union trying to take the fox's place in the chicken coop. I think that this is a huge conflict of interest for union members to be involved. Who is representing who here? Last years fiasco was only the start.
It is not the market nor the democratic process leading the war on coal, it is Obama at the direction of the left using the EPA thru directives to kill this industry when they had the chance. Basically making hay while the sun is shining. All this would never fly if it had to go thru the legislative process. Only Obama and DMB would brave enough to vote yea. As is the case with the left they are good at winning the war without firing a shot, This tactic is used every day of the year across the nation pushing their agenda. If not for Trump, Hillary would have continued this cesspool of deception ad infinitum. The same is true of climate "change", only sleight of hand will make this slush fund for dictators possible. I'm not a denier, I don't know, but killing coal and making us noncompetitive allows those with no concern for AGW to produce the worlds goods. But I am missing the picture because AGW is just a decoy for their agenda.
If I am considering a new power plant that may operate for a century, I don't think that the spot price of gas is going to be the deciding factor. Now when our fearless leader sics the EPA on me and I don't know the political future that is HUGE.
Let's look at the Obama reign, other than AF1 burning a lot of fuel and health care collapsing Obama got to run a continuous campaign. All his directives will go up in dust and he has lost big time numbers across the country. About the only accomplishment was dividing the country with ridicule.
How many of these characters including pot use lose all ambition and expect us to support them?
Last login: Monday, November 21, 2016
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2016 Steamboat Pilot & Today. All rights reserved.
Tablet version |