Dan Shores

Dan Shores 18 hours, 47 minutes ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

I rest my case nut jobs! You can't and won't answer my questions and you know why. Your only repsonse is further childish insult. Dan K. says I am a "petulant child" for not answering his questions. So what does that make all of you? I want you all to remember how you won't answer a simple question. And you can be sure that I won't let you forget it!

0

Dan Shores 1 day, 16 hours ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

Sooooo funny. You scared little children. You refuse to answer the question because you know answering it will expose you as the fraudulent hypocrites that you all are. Hahahahaha! Dan K. won't answer, Mark won't answer, Tomo won't answer. As usual, more insults, zero substance. Yeah, I realize I get under your skin, that's what makes it so fun you to watch you boyz squirm, try and change the subject and come up with excuse after excuse, find spelling errors or typos, or OJ to focus on. What does OJ have to do with anything Mark? Another question you refuse to answer. You know why you behave to way you do don't you? Because you're lazy. It's lazy, childish and petty and it allows you pretend that you are superior. Just like you pretend to be tough talkin, gun totin, bad dudes. What a joke! You have no sensible, logical argument. You are really, really frustrated, angry and you can't stand it when someone dosen't cower in your presence. Here's another interesting thought that will keep you up at night. It looks like Bernie is gaining momentum. So is Trump. Problem is, whether it's Bernie, Hillary or Trump, it won't matter to you, cause you hate em all. Four more years of anger, eight more years of frustration, wow. Wouldn't be surprised if you tough guys end up starting your own version of the Bundy gang. Heard another interesting analysis. Seems that even though Trump has yuuuuge leads in the polling, it is difficult to find anyone who will say they are going to vote for him. These folks who claim that they aren't voting for Trump also won't endorse or commit to any candidate. Sound familiar? But since Trump does get votes, including a win in New Hampshire, the conclusion is that the people who claim to not be Trump suppoerters and don't endorse any candidate are indeed Trump supporters. They just won't admit it. I think we just figured out who the "posse" will be votig for. Well keep on pretending. Hold on tight to your guns cause Beyonce and the Black Panthers, Muslims, undocumented Mexicans and a bunch of commie traitor liberals might just show up at your doorstep any day now. Better watch your back!

0

Dan Shores 2 days, 16 hours ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

Wow Tomo....I can't imagine what kind of pervrse world you must live in. But hey...it's you right....this is America....right Tomo? Just like it's the right of Beyonce to send out whatever message she chooses, or lady Gaga to dress and act anyway she chooses, or Madison Avenue to create whatever ads they belive will sell product. But Tomo I almost forgot, you and conservative America are just so much smarter and so much more pure than the rest of us....right Tomo? You also have a right to simply turn off the commercials and the half time show. Calling me out for a typo or spelling error is simply petty, simple minded and childish Tomo, nothing else. And Rhys can simply choose to not read the comments. I wonder if Rhys cares to answer my question as to why it is perfectly acceptable for John B. to make obscene insulting remarks directed at me, but not OK for me to criticize the GOP, the conservative movement in general and the hypocritiacl nonsense being spewed on a daily basis by the "posse." Excuse me Mark, but our legal systems is flawed and does make mistakes. Innocent people are sometimes convicted of crimes they didn't commit and sometimes executed. We know this to be a fact. Sometimes guilty parties are set free. This is the case with OJ and I have no idea what point you are trying to make. This is your typical "all or nothing" argument. All capitalism, no socialism, or all socialism, no capitalism. You can't imagine the society, that we actually live in, that is a combination of both! Again, you're just desperate, grabing at straws, trying to change the subject away from my question that you cannot answer. I repeat, pathetic.

0

Dan Shores 3 days, 17 hours ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

You're the smartest Rhys, hands down, of course. Maroon? Hey Tomo... you going to call out Mark for his spelling error? Or was he talking about the color....or the verb? What's up with the OJ thing Mark. You off the meds? OJ is a cold blooded double murderer. What has he got to do with the debate about the posse's lunacy and shameful hypocrisy and cowardice?

0

Dan Shores 4 days, 16 hours ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

So funny how the "posse" still won't and can't answer the question I put before you. Dan K. certainly won't answer. Why is it that you are perfectly fine when your members personaly insult me with crude and obscene remarks, but are so very offended when I call out the GOP and the conservatibve movement for what it is? None of you can answer that question....can you? Let's see how you come back and try and change the subject. O.J.? Deflect, ignore, level more insults.....what a joke. The reason you can't answer is because you know you have no answer and to answer would simply expose you as the hypocritcal frauds that you are. You can't endorse a candidate, there is no poilitcal ideology that speaks for you. No....you prefer to sit back and criticize and pretend that you are just so much smarter and so more more insightful than the rest of us. You've got it all figured out, right Tomo and Mark? Heck....I can't even spell liberalism, right Tomo? You get a laugh out of the democratic debate. Do you laugh or do you cry when the GOP candidates suggest carpet bombing masses of civilians as an answer to your paranoia? You're concerned about the debt, but hey, let's spend a bizillion dollars to build up our already bloated military, as if that would somehow convince the Chinese not to commit suicide by launching an attack against their biggest trading partner. Or the nut case in North Korea, or the Taliban, or ISIS really care whether we could nuke them 1,000 times over or 10,000 times over. But all this tough guy talk really makes you feel good about yourself. Now you can hold on tight to your gun and try and make up for your lack of self esteem and pretend that you're just so much smarter.....and feel like a real badass too! Pathetic!

0

Dan Shores 5 days, 17 hours ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

Dan K., you still refuse to respond to any question. Have you forgotten that you called me a "petulant child" for not answering your question? I have someone banned for making crude and obscene comments, personal insults.....yes.....of course. That kind of behavior doesn't belong on a public forum. The irony is that you are perfectly fine with these crude and rude insuts, as long as they are directed at me. Why should it be neccessary or acceptable to insult others? What is so wrong with respectful debate on the merits of ones argument? For some bizarre reason, you apparently feel that disagreeing with a political ideology is akin to insulting someone. I don't get it Dan K.? I don't think you get it either, you are just grasping at straws and hiding behind your inabiity to formulate any sort of introspective thought. You feign this great outrage that I should dare to disagree and express my views, but are perfectly fine with anyone diagreeing with my beliefs and personally insulting me. That's fake Dan K., that's a fraud! There is no other way to describe your behavior. Yes......I am a champion and a warrior for progressivism, liberalism, for equality and fairness, honesty and truth and I'm sorry that you and your bud's find this so offensive. I'll be damned if I'm going to sit by and do nothing as the GOP attempts to destroy all of the gains we have made in the last 8 years. I will do all I can to insure that we continue on the path that our president has started us on. So you might as well get used to it, I'm not going to change no matter how many insults or childish rants you all come up with. Spell checkers have at it. Got a bluebird ski day awaiting.

0

Dan Shores 6 days, 9 hours ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

Once again Dan K. you are so confused. You don't have free speech rights on this forum. Nobody does. People who disagree with me here aren't granting me anything, and I am not taking anything away from anyone else. Why is that so hard to understand? Why, I'll ask you again, why are you so offended by what you perceive to be "hateful rants" yet perfectly fine with you pal's cude and obscene comments directed at me? Do you now claim that your BFF's rants weren't hateful? How is that not hypochrisy? How do you explain this behavior, even to yourself, forget about explaining it to me. You would like to see my comments banned, simply because I disagree with the republican party and the conservative agenda. And your not a conservative, correct? What gives Dan K.? You and your clan members claim to be so above it all and in possession of such vastly superior intelligence and insight than the rest of us, yet there is no one in the political arena who speaks for you. Not one single person! No one that you or your buddies are willing to endorse or would support to lead us into the future. There is no political party that embodies your views. How can that be? No...... you claim to be an independent, but you support virtually every conservative platform and oppose virtually every liberal platform. Yeah.....I would call that a fraud.

0

Dan Shores 6 days, 14 hours ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

Hahahahaha Ken. Ever think of going pro with your comedy act? Here's the deal, it is the height of hypocrisy to complain that I insult people, while saying nothing about others insulting me. My comments are not directed at individuals, unless I am attacked, but rather at a political party and a political ideology. We have people like Dan K here, who feign outrage and at my alleged insult to others, but have no compaint whatsoever about insults directed at me. That's hypocrisy, plain and simple! You hear me Tomo! What has really gotten under your collective skin is the content of my comments. You have no counter. You are unable to formulate a logical, fact based response that isn't predicated on bombast, misinterpretation, mischaracterization, some paranoid delusion of reality, or just outright lies. So instead, you level a personal insult here and there, or you atttack spelling, typos, or percieved gramatical errors, then pretend outrage when I call you out. This is the fraud, the fake, the phony and oft used tactic of the angry, frustrated, closed minded, pigheaded right wing base of which I speak. I am a fighter, always have been, always will be. I'm not going away, I'm not going to be silenced and I'm not going to reamin silent in the face of personal insult. I'm not about to change. If you don't want to be subjected to insults, here's a clue for you, don't insult me. Attack the substance of my comments, attack the liberal progressive movement, attack the candidates, that's all fair game, but if you attack me personally, you're gonna get it back! I realize this is a very difficult concept for you all to understand, but why don't you calm down and think about it for a while. See if you can behave like adults. Now excuse me if I made any spelling errors or typos. I'm kinda in a rush, I have more glorious powder to ski.

0

Dan Shores 1 week, 1 day ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

Yes Scott, I agree with your assessment. Here's what I'm saying though about Trump. His entire campaign message has been predicated on him being a winner. He wins at everything, according to him. He leads in all the polls by a wide margin, he will bring so much winning that we will get bored with winning. Anyone who doesn't win is a loser, according to Trump. He also said that if he doesn't win Iowa, he will consider it a yuuuuge mistake and a very, very expensive waste of time. So the first time voters actually cast a vote, he came in second, despite the polling. Now he has changed his tune and claims that second place was very satisfying and by the way, he got the second most votes ever in Iowa caucus history and that he is responsible for the largest caucus turnout in Iowa history. Early polling is indicating a victory for John Kasich in New Hampshire. Then we have South Carolina where the evangelical vote is yuuuuge, and we already say what happened in Iowa. What will he have to say if he doesn't win both of these primaries? I believe that bringing Sarah Palin on board was a yuuuge mistake and highlights his lack of judgement. She is the butt of numerous jokes and her approval rating is about as low as it can possibly get. I do agree with some of his policy statements and that is what has the GOP in a complete panic. It is possible for him to win the nomination, but impossible, in my view, for him to win the general. He would have to win something like 40% of the Hispanic vote, a large percentage of African Americans and win over a large percentage of women, who by the way are the largest voting bloc. He has alienated far too many people and is repulsive to the vast majority of voters. He doesn't even have the support of the extremists that contribute here, so that should tell us something. Speaking of which Dan K., I have to say that you are the most disingenuous, fake, phony, fraudulent individual that I have ever encountered. You feign outrage and disgust at my comments, which are not directed at you by the way, but at a political party and a political ideology of which you claim not to be a part. I must remind you that you remained completely silent, as did the rest of your little group, when your good friend and confidant, John B., was insulting me with vile, crude and obscene insults. His vile and obscene comments are what got him banned from contributing here, and you call that he be reinstated. Now if that isn't the height of hypocrisy, I don't know what is. Apparently you have now reduced yourself to his level, as your only contribution to the discussion is to insult me. How sad! I shall await the spell checkers and grammar coaches.

0

Dan Shores 1 week, 2 days ago on Speaker warns of Chinese military threat

Yes Tomo....I confess that I didn't properly proof my comments and thereby commited a cardinal sin, the dreaded typo. I have an excuse though, I was concerned about being late for work as I had another spectacular powder day awaiting. I'm losing track as to how many fantastic powders day I have had the pleasure to enjoy, and it's only the first of Feb. Well, it's comforting to know that I now have two, count em two, spell checkers to remind me to be more careful. I have also a grammarian following my comments just to criticize my writing skills and my use of the English language. I am so lucky! Tomo I say pack your bags now. Why wait? I also have a suggestion as to where you can go. Haha. Interesting to see the results from Iowa, even though they are pretty much meaningless when it comes to predicting who will actually be the nominee. It seems that Iowan's just couldn't pull the trigger when it came to actually casting a vote for Trump. He did come in second place, but it wasn't the yuuuuuge win that he predicted. Apparently his Evangelical bona fides just didn't hold up and instead voters went with the true Christian psychotic, Cruz. It could also be a strategic error in not showing up for the final debate, or some combination of the two. What an interesting year in politics. It's really gonna be fun to watch, and it's especially fun to watch the GOP and the conservative movement literally destroy itself.

0

Prev