Dan Kuechenmeister

Dan Kuechenmeister 2 days, 7 hours ago on Quinn: Model for counseling

Scott says "it will cost us trillions of dollars to deal with climate change". And you Scott W know that because????

0

Dan Kuechenmeister 2 days, 17 hours ago on Quinn: Model for counseling

And for giggles here is part of a bit by George Carlin regards "saving" the planet. Would have posted the you tube video but it contains a bit of language that may not be appropriate for this forum. I would encourage folks to google George Carlin on Earth Day and watch the entire video. It is about 7 and 1/2 minutes long and very good. There are a few ef bombs.

George Carlin “We’re so self-important. Everybody’s going to save something now. “Save the trees, save the bees, save the whales, save those snails.” And the greatest arrogance of all: save the planet. Save the planet, we don’t even know how to take care of ourselves yet. I’m tired of this s#@. I’m tired of Earth Day. I’m tired of these self-righteous environmentalists, these white, bourgeois liberals who think the only thing wrong with this country is that there aren’t enough bicycle paths. People trying to make the world safe for Volvos. Besides, environmentalists don’t give a s#@ about the planet. Not in the abstract they don’t. You know what they’re interested in? A clean place to live. Their own habitat. They’re worried that some day in the future they might be personally inconvenienced. Narrow, unenlightened self-interest doesn’t impress me.

The planet has been through a lot worse than us. Been through earthquakes, volcanoes, plate tectonics, continental drift, solar flares, sun spots, magnetic storms, the magnetic reversal of the poles … hundreds of thousands of years of bombardment by comets and asteroids and meteors, worldwide floods, tidal waves, worldwide fires, erosion, cosmic rays, recurring ice ages … And we think some plastic bags and some aluminum cans are going to make a difference? The planet isn’t going anywhere. WE are!

We’re going away. Pack your s*#@, folks. We’re going away. And we won’t leave much of a trace, either. Maybe a little Styrofoam … The planet’ll be here and we’ll be long gone. Just another failed mutation. Just another closed-end biological mistake. An evolutionary cul-de-sac. The planet’ll shake us off like a bad case of fleas.

The planet will be here for a long, long, LONG time after we’re gone, and it will heal itself, it will cleanse itself, ’cause that’s what it does. It’s a self-correcting system. The air and the water will recover, the earth will be renewed. And if it’s true that plastic is not degradable, well, the planet will simply incorporate plastic into a new paradigm: the earth plus plastic. The earth doesn’t share our prejudice toward plastic. Plastic came out of the earth. The earth probably sees plastic as just another one of its children. Could be the only reason the earth allowed us to be spawned from it in the first place. It wanted plastic for itself. Didn’t know how to make it. Needed us. Could be the answer to our age-old egocentric philosophical question, “Why are we here?”

Plastic… ”

0

Dan Kuechenmeister 2 days, 17 hours ago on Quinn: Model for counseling

And so no one can say I have a bias against the global warming crowd. Here are some predictions from the global cooling crowd.

June, 1975, Nigel Calder in International Wildlife: “The continued rapid cooling of the earth since WWII is in accord with the increase in global air pollution associated with industrialization, mechanization, urbanization and exploding population.”

July 9, 1971, Washington Post: “In the next 50 years fine dust that humans discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun’s rays that the Earth’s average temperature could fall by six degrees. Sustained emissions over five to ten years, could be sufficient to trigger an ice age.”

1976 Lowell Ponte in “The Cooling,”: “This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000.”

April 28, 1975 Newsweek “There are ominous signs that Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically….The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it….The central fact is that…the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down…If the climate change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic.”

“Earth Day” 1970 Kenneth Watt, ecologist: “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”

“Earth Day” 1970 Kenneth Watt, ecologist: “At the present rate of nitrogen build-up, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”

January 1970 Life Magazine “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support …the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half…”

0

Dan Kuechenmeister 2 days, 18 hours ago on Quinn: Model for counseling

Hey Scott, Thought you might enjoy these "predictions" from the global warming crowd.

1969, Lubos Moti, Czech physicist: “It is now pretty clearly agreed that CO2 content [in the atmosphere] will rise 25% by 2000. This could increase the average temperature near the earth’s surface by 7 degrees Fahrenheit. This in turn could raise the level of the sea by 10 feet. Goodbye New York. Goodbye Washington, for that matter.”

June 8, 1972, Christian Science Monitor: “Arctic specialist Bernt Balchen says a general warming trend over the North Pole is melting the polar ice cap and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the year 2000.”

2008 Dr. James Hansen of the Goddard Space Institute (NASA) on a visit to Britain: “The recent warm winters that Britain has experienced are a sign that the climate is changing.” [Two exceptionally cold winters followed. The 2009-10 winter may be the coldest experienced in the UK since 1683.]

April 18, 1990, Denver Post: “Giant sand dunes may turn Plains to desert–huge sand dunes extending east from Colorado’s Front Range may be on the verge of breaking through the thin topsoil, transforming America’s rolling High Plains into a desert, new research suggests. The giant sand dunes discovered by NASA satellite photos are expected to re-emerge over the next 20 t0 50 years, depending on how fast average temperatures rise from the suspected ‘greenhouse effect’ scientists believe.”

Michael Oppenheimer, 1990, The Environmental Defense Fund: “By 1995, the greenhouse effect would be desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots…”(By 1996) The Platte River of Nebraska would be dry, while a continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers…The Mexican police will round up illegal American migrants surging into Mexico seeking work as field hands.”

June 30, 1989, Associated Press: U.N. OFFICIAL PREDICTS DISASTER, SAYS GREENHOUSE EFFECT COULD WIPE SOME NATIONS OFF MAP–entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos,” said Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program. He added that governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect.

0

Dan Kuechenmeister 3 days, 8 hours ago on Quinn: Model for counseling

Scott, I knew you wouldn't let me down. The sky is falling and we knuckle draggers that believe there are two sides to the debate just don't get it. Thank goodness we have you to set us straight. I could play your game and bring link after link to suggest that science is not settled but fortunately I have better things to do. Keep on ranting oh great doctor of climatology. Trolling is fun.

0

Dan Kuechenmeister 3 days, 10 hours ago on Quinn: Model for counseling

The basic science of global warming??? Back to that rant, are you Scott. Please pray tell oh great doctor of climatology, riddle me this. CO2 levels are according to the consensus rising about 2 ppm (parts per million) per year and yet where is the "global warming". (see article quote below) I know, you will now place me in the box of "people lacking education", you will cite chapter and verse as to why I am an illiterate knuckle dragger but you know what - sorry but it is not settled science. There are 2 sides to the debate and I for one will continue to listen to both sides knowing full well that I may not ever know which side was ultimately right. My guess is neither and the climate will continue to change regardless of we carbon spewing illiterates who refuse to join the church of the climatistas. I will look forward to having to go to a re-education camp when the jackboots take over.

Karl Ritter, Associated Press | September 19, 2013 | Last Updated: Jan 25 1:20 PM ET STOCKHOLM, Sweden — Scientists working on a landmark UN report on climate change are struggling to explain why global warming appears to have slowed down in the past 15 years even though greenhouse gas emissions keep rising.

Leaked documents obtained by The Associated Press show there are deep concerns among governments over how to address the issue ahead of next week’s meeting of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Climate skeptics have used the lull in surface warming since 1998 to cast doubt on the scientific consensus that humans are cooking the planet by burning fossil fuels and cutting down CO2-absorbing forests.

0

Dan Kuechenmeister 5 days, 4 hours ago on County Commissioners put pedal down on plan to shave Yellowjacket's crown

If they want to give us poor slugs in Stagecoach a fighting chance give us solid shoulders from the reservoir entrance to 131. The height of Yellow Jacket Pass means nothing.

0

Dan Kuechenmeister 5 days, 5 hours ago on Colorado weighs the best means of sharing the water

Best I can tell it appears there are 100 + golf courses within 12 miles of the center of Palm DESERT. ( How about it Tom - capital letters). All these golf courses in the bleeping desert. Did anybody looking at historical weather patterns for the desert of California. They have droughts. Sometimes they last for a long time. Hubris, ya think! I wonder how much water it takes to keep the fairways lush and the greens "green". No evaporation there.

0

Dan Kuechenmeister 5 days, 9 hours ago on Ciao from Cortina: What we found, North to South

I don't know Sophie. Sounds like you are liking the Italian lifestyle. It does grow on you. Magnetic I believe is a term you have used. Thanks as always for your articles. Quite enjoyable to see Italy through your eyes.

0