Jump to content
Gee, with that kind of armament you would think we had a terrorist in our midst . . . . . . . . .
Steve, being a smaller govt type, I could never agree to city owned housing. However, we are in a crunch period until more units are built. So maybe the city keeps Iron Horse and allows housing again at the Alpiner for low wage workers for one more season and fast tracks the proposed multi-family projects that have been proposed--at Walton Creek and on Elk River Road. "Sandwiched between railroad and highway. . . . " is not a good long term option as that parcel is better served for short term guests. I would assume a developer would develop it as such. The projects that I have seen proposed are in a more "residential (quiet) location with close access to bus routes which I think is key. I think they are also safer locations for low income families with children. There has been no consistency at the City for years with constant turnover in councils and at city manager. Better that they contract for some units in the new projects that have been proposed for their bus drivers and other full time employees. The old hotel rooms of Iron Horse and Alpiner can never be considered adequate no matter how much $$ is put into remodel.
Sorry to be crude, Steve, but the city cannot find its own a** with both hands as this council and past (yay) city manager have demonstrated. Plus the Iron Horse site is not a great location for long term housing. A better solution is to give priority for the proposed multi-family projects, especially rental units, to be built. If the city needs housing, it would be much less risky and costly for the city to subsidize the rents of their low-wage employees as part of their "benefit package." . . .. just a thought.
Our differences are the way we view the negatives/positives of the country. The way we view the priorities. I am not going to argue what you state as "fact" above--I will leave that to others. But to answer your final statement in the previous post--if the Dems put up Clinton or Sanders or Biden or Warren they will not have a chance in '16. The Dems will not vote for the Republican candidate---they will just stay home and not vote. And that is my final word on this thread. Have a nice day!
Extremism on EITHER side of the aisle is a non-starter. Sorry, Dan S, but I think your positions are extreme to the left while Huckabee is extreme to the right. I believe we DO have choices in the GOP lineup that are more moderate. Rand Paul, Carly Fiorina, John Kasich. I consider myself a moderate and I think my positions on issues back that up. The latest polling in Iowa has Trump in a dead heat with Carson and Fiorina running 3rd. Believe me, the registered Republicans are fed up with politics as usual and the same old names running for office, BUT so are the Dems. Independent voters will decide this election and I believe other candidates will emerge before this bloodbath is over. We need a fiscally conservative moderate. Period. IMHO
Dan, I said a modified flat tax. Everyone pays into the system. For example, a family of 4 with a gross income of $40,000 pays 5% or thereabouts, A couple with no dependent children pay with a gross income of $300,000 pay 16%-18%. Same with businesses---no deductions, no loopholes. My income/percentages are subject to review but every US citizen has is vested in, frankly, being an American, which means paying taxes. Taxes on all income, including govt subsidies, capital gains, etc. Also, you are wrong about all the GOP candidates. Fiorina/Kasich have indicated that while they may be personally against abortion/gay marriage that they respect the Supreme Courts decisions on these matters and "lets move on" to other dire issues facing this country. Personally, I am against abortion after 20 weeks. If a woman cannot decide to have an abortion within the first 5 months of pregnancy, then the baby should be born. Plenty of good families willing to adopt. I am an independent, like at least 50% of the voting public and issues matter. Planned Parenthood serves an important function, but like all charitable organizations (including churches, United Way, public radio) should be funded by individuals with a passions for their charity of choice. The govt business is not to subsidize charities just like it should not be subsidizing high income individuals with tax loopholes.
Thanks for sharing, Brian---(maybe. . ) but on a lighter note. Dan S. cover your eyes, don't want to offend you.
The IRS sent my Tax Return back! AGAIN!! I guess it was because of my response to the question: "List all dependents" I replied-"12 million illegal immigrants; 3 million crack heads; 42 million unemployable people on food stamps, 2 million people in over 243 prisons and 535 fools in the U.S. House and Senate." Apparently, this was NOT an acceptable answer.
Thanks, Dan! I didn't address my absolute horror with long-term disability payments and the abuse in that system--but I will spare you my diatribe : )
Government and debt would only grow under a Warren Presidency---are you sure that is what you REALLY want????????
Dan, If govt regulation were reduced the incentives should be given to private industry to move into the inner cities to build business/manufacturing/tech businesses. Govt is the most inefficient of all spenders. Let the Private sector do the work where the govt has failed so miserably. And yes, volunteer work should be required of those receiving assistance if they are not working parttime or going to school. Sitting in front of the TV eating cherry bon-bons while waiting for their "goodies" will not endear any welfare recipient to a hard working taxpayer.
Last login: Thursday, August 25, 2016
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2016 Steamboat Pilot & Today. All rights reserved.
Tablet version |