Jump to content
So many trolls. So effortlessly worked into a lather like Pavlov's drooling cur. He's here all week, folks. Tip your waitress!
The gun grabbers are right about Australia, as Jeff points out. Proponents of confiscation in the United States have to aggressively turn a blind eye to our founding and cultural history, which makes banning guns here as likely as the French outlawing cheese and wine.
Victory! San Francisco's last gun store is being regulated right out of business. No more gun violence in San Fran!
Kumbaya, my friends. Kumbaya.
Bernie doesn't have a prayer. Hillary has the megabucks to turf him under. The only difference between him & Hill is that he's willing to announce his commitment to collectivism; Hillary's not that open and honest about hers.
You need links to an aspersion you've doubled down on in this thread alone? Seriously? I guess you're such a busy guy with so much on his plate you need a "bully" like me to keep track of what you've said and who you've said it to. And thanks for the heads up on how few people read my contributions. They're so inconsequential that you've replied to nearly every post I've made in the last 48 hours. Which is every post I've made in the last week or two. So many trolls. So in thrall to the dinner bell like Pavlov's drooling dog.
And of course, you can provide a PDF or similar facsimile of the these contracts, yes? And even presuming those contracts contain the provisions you allege, why to you believe it appropriate to deny the producers of multiple commodities the opportunity to see their sacrifices rewarded? At the very least, should not those contracts contain a disclosure that the fetal material being removed from the woman's womb will be used by PP as fuel for an income stream? If not, why?
And I'm equally sure you can prove that the Director of Research for Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Melissa Farrell, who boasts in the 5th video how her clinic's scrupulous harvest and sale of the most viable body parts "contributes so much to the bottom line of our organization here, you know we’re one of the largest affiliates, our Research Department is the largest in the United States. Larger than any the other affiliates’ combined" was telling a big fat lie.
And please, Eric: don't trouble yourself about my concern for your respect. The derision of a witless demagogue is something I proudly wear like a badge. I might lose few nanoseconds of sleep were I to be deprived of that distinction.
But look on the bright side: if you and your ilk are able to implement Margaret Sanger's vision, you will never have choke down the indignity of suffering the impudent blather of dysgenics like me and my progeny; as we will have been segregated and sterilized unto extinction. I offer a hearty Seig Heil to you, Hillary, and your Wondrous Whitness.
Mark: I hope that African nature show devoted at least one segment in tribute to the Most Noble Cecil. And that you have joined the compassionate lynch mob targeting the dentist.
So get of your high horse and embrace your inner Gaia, you Hartless reprobate.
Once upon a time, there was an American visionary dedicated to the advancement of the human race. She fearlessly championed the cause of improving the species, and was unafraid to call for difficult choices to be made (emphases mine):
“We want a world freer, happier, cleaner – we want a race of thoroughbreds.”
“Many, perhaps, will think it idle to go farther in demonstrating the immorality of large families, but since there is still an abundance of proof at hand, it may be offered for the sake of those who find difficulty in adjusting old-fashioned ideas to the facts. The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
“The main objects of the Population Congress would be to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring; to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.”
So powerful were her proclamations that she was invited to appear before the Ku Klux Klan – an invitation she enthusiastically accepted and fondly recalled in her autobiography. So compelling was her mission statement, that she was praised from thousands of miles away by the Nazis in Gemany.
In 1939, she launched The Negro Project: “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members”
Her name is Margaret Sanger, and she founded Planned Parenthood. One might suppose it is merely a coincidence that more than 80% of Planned Parenthood clinics are in or within walking distance of minority communities, but I don't believe in coincidence.
In the here and now, Sanger is praised by the Democrat front-runner for President: “Now, I have to tell you that it was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision. Another of my great friends, Ellen Chesler, is here, who wrote a magnificent biography of Margaret Sanger called Woman of Valor. And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I am really in awe of her.” ~ Hillary Clinton, 2009
Why does the American left celebrate the life and legacy of an evil, genocidal racist?
As a post script, I haven't looked deeply enough into Sanger to know for certain what her views on Asians were. But even if she had been generous enough to look past my slanted eyes, I'm confident my birth defect would have obliged me to choose between "segregation or sterilization."
So good to know that Hillary is "in awe of her."
Here's something I'm curious about: the women from whom those valuable commodities were extracted - did they receive a cut of the prices being negotiated in the videos? If not, why?
If I invested the time and effort to grow weed, say - I'd expect to be compensated. These women grew a kaleidoscope of saleable products and material and grist for Planned Parenthood's mill. They are entitled to some recompense, no?
Mark has a point, Rhys. Where are the insults? I see Bowman dropping his redneck "gummint thugs comin' to take yer guns" jive every chance he gets. Not unlike the Wyatt Earp smear you used to deploy against me - over and over again - not so long ago. It's so knee-jerk that your side doesn't even seem to realize you're doing it. If quoting James Madison or presuming to oppose the confiscation of wealth makes me or Hartless "contentious" (and thank you for be so civil and gracious for explaining how that's your code word for asshole), then I guess we'll just have to hope & pray that one day we'll be as enlightened as those of you who use quotes as window dressing to pretty up your aspersions.
Last login: Saturday, October 3, 2015
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2015 Steamboat Pilot & Today. All rights reserved.