Jump to content
No "lost opportunity" if the voters turn down the $100M bond issue. District can buy the land without spending $100M on speculative school construction. Can always come back with a better justified construction plan in a future election.
What we should be doing is talking merger with Soroco. Stagecoach is a huge problem for both districts as being a major source of out of district students for SB and being the largest population center in Soroco and yet barely uses Soroco schools.
Soroco schools have spare capacity which could largely solve SSSD's crowding issues. Having an unified district elementary school near Stagecoach would work for everyone.
As for the report, more examples of a city manager trying to be a one person show.
Locals that work for local companies know that an employee doesn't skip layers of management and meet one on one with the CEO to discuss issues. That if something so serious exists to justify that meeting then either layers of management is also in the meeting or HR director and legal is also there.
These problems expose the problem of one on one meetings of there being a serious problem that justifies the meeting, but no record of what was said.
As for Bantle's specific charge of being bypassed for promotion - because of the legal difficulty of proving intentional discrimination, the new legal standard is to use statistics to say what would be expected number of people in management if things were fair. A police dept with no women managers is thus discriminatory because if things were fair then the odds of having zero women managers is zero.
I'm shocked that you think Tom Brady has any obligation to give the NFL his phone with his personal messages.
So he is being punished for exercising right to privacy since NFL has allowed teams to handle balls and has no punishment or even procedure for finding an out of spec ball.
Looked up some articles on Aspen school district which is one of the very few in Colorado that is comparable to SB as a district that only includes the expensive area and not nearby lower housing cost areas.
A few years ago, their schools were over designed enrollment. Their response has been to cut down on out of district enrollment. It is implied that a school being over designed enrollment is sufficient to say there is no more room. They don't have to check every class in every grade as being full. The fact that the school is full is enough.
And even though they are ranked the number one school district in the state based upon academic performance and other factors by several websites, they are seeing declining enrollment in their elementary school. They are going to solve their overcrowding issue by limiting out of district enrollment and letting their demographic trend result in bringing enrollment down.
There was pretty severe mismanagement and inept management at YVHA, but it wasn't obviously criminal to me. And YVHA board took many steps to rectify the situation. There were things that were arguably criminal, but it wasn't clear who had approved what and if anyone had profited. Looks to me like YVHA would have had a good defense of incompetence that they were trying to fix.
Such as failing to show expected rental revenues could be an indication of skimming, but YVHA truly failed to collect rent from those that didn't feel like paying. George has said that there are HUD rules against accepting cash, but those rules are primarily used as easier to prove charges in skimming or other fraud cases. They haven't charged people for merely accepting cash.
And illegal meetings are not criminal violations, but mean that any decisions made in those meetings are not legally binding and any materials presented become public records. The not valid decisions can be rectified by then holding a legal public meeting.
My view is that George was so well trained in doing government the right way that he thought people actually cared that the laws were followed and that criminal charges would follow. He wasn't prepared for "so who in charge personally significantly benefited?" and "Looks like they are now trying to mostly put things right". And so there was no interest to prosecute.
And either the paper lacked the competent reporters for a potentially award winning investigation that would have taken as much skill as listening in on public meetings, or they consciously made a decision to ignore it.
Not surprising from a DA's office that charged someone with a felony for failing a polygraph on a job application.
I don't know precisely how more renters affects the demographic mix when housing prices are increasing.
That would be an excellent question for a professional demographer. Oh wait, proponents have already decided no such expertise is wanted.
If that was an option then it has expired due to statute of limitations.
And I doubt it was an option because the contract clearly states that cabin must be built before public gets access to trails. So it wasn't the sort of error that is covered by insurance because it was intentional that was not well thought out. Arguably every contract could have someone complaining that there are clauses that didn't mean what the person wanted.
Legal liability is to cover $30,000 (thirty dollars) that was supposed to be $30,000 and so on.
This blog is relatively unique in the high level of personal attack allowed at those that post.
George attacked public figures for their alleged misdeeds in the public duties. Most other blogs do not restrict that.
It would be better if there was more room for conversation on these blogs, but banning George does nothing for that. That requires enforcing the no personal attacks against those that post.
At least a longer term demographics report by a professional demographer can educate the public on the topics.
For instance, there are different family profiles of age/number based upon income/wealth. So as SB housing prices go up then we will see fewer kids. That is a fact of demographics.
If you think there will be lots of housing built then that would counteract that. But then that would place the additional elementary school stupidly far from the new housing.
Last login: Saturday, July 18, 2015
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2015 Steamboat Pilot & Today. All rights reserved.