Jump to content
Honestly I'm tired of both cyclists and motorists just blowing through stops signs. With no enforcement the laws are worthless and pointless until someone gets hurt and lawyers get involved.
The devil is in the details but that is a really interesting proposal for spot.
This reasonably explains it:
I'm with Robin ... bring 'em on. In my driving experiences overseas (even when they have you drive on the 'wrong' side of the road they are easy to navigate and keep traffic flowing.
Ms. Sturm .. Harry Truman said "There is nothing new in the world except the history we don't know" ... an expression that he, of course, borrowed from Ben Franklin who borrowed it from a French diplomat whose name escapes me.
Your statement "Clinton, the most corrupt and deceitful presidential candidate in modern American history" ignores not only history but the present where Mr. Trump ... clearly by any reasonable view ... is the most corrupt and deceitful presidential candidate in modern American history.
I have to agree. I was a juror for a one day criminal trial last year for someone accused of stealing $95 with no evidence. Wonder how much was, as taxpayers, paid for that.
Dan ... I tend to agree with you and the editorial. It seems to me the only people that loose (maybe) in this is existing home owners who may not see their homes appreciate at double digit rates (that old elasticity of demand conundrum). With homes selling at $300/sq ft now there is a really large segment of the workforce ... even in skilled jobs ... that will just never qualify to buy. Development for projects like this needs to be a bit less onerous ... my opinion.
"Anne Small, the city's director of general services, warned the council that seating a vocal and outspoken citizen such as Wedel on the committee could "disrupt" the interview process."
Perfect ... based on the recent failures with the past several city managers I'd say some disruption of the typical process is in order.
Scott Wedel and I disagree on many things ... but disagreements can create great results if everyone involved can learn to listen as well as they speak. I think Scott should be given the chance to participate.
"If the parcel is annexed, the zoning would be determined at a later date."
To me that's the crux of the problem with this process, The developers have stated to me that they would prefer minimal density ... something transitional ... supported by a number of local property owners. The unknown development potential is a huge concern. The city staff and some on council seem to prefer maximum density ... like the transitional mess in cities like Boulder ... open space to maximum density in the blink of an eye.
To me ... the problem with maximum density is the lack of city infrastructure in adjoining streets funneling into Soda Creek Elementary ... narrow streets, no side walks, inconstant snow plowing. Yahmomite and Merritt funnel tons of traffic to SCE already. Someone from city staff needs to watch what happens on Merritt between 8 and 8:30 am and 3 to 3:30 pm to understand the problem.
The developer can't be expected to solve all of these issues on their own ... the city needs to step up, prioritize, and deal with city charter issues like public safety and security (as opposed to notable discretionary items like gravity induced slides at subsidized ski hills) before it expands it's boundaries.
I get the potential need to absorb by expanding through the Urban Growth Boundary .,, but the city (and city staff) also needs to get that it has a responsibility to deal with infrastructure impacts related to that expansion beyond the specific bounds of the UGB.
Count me as a citizen disappointed with city council's vote on this issue.
Last login: Wednesday, February 15, 2017
Contents of this site are © Copyright 2017 Steamboat Pilot & Today. All rights reserved.
Tablet version |