Are the Routt County Clerk's concerns about a new law reducing the charge for copying public records to no more than 25 cents per page justified?

Yes 30% 69 votes

No 69% 159 votes

228 total votes

Comments

thecondoguy1 (anonymous) says...

NO............I will copy pages all day long for 2bits a piece, gimmie a break, it's a profit center for any other operation even at 5 cents each.......

August 8, 2007 at 5:22 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Pc (anonymous) says...

A person can take a document to Kinko's and copy it for 5 cents, but the County Clerk has to organize, store, retrieve and refile the documents as well as copying them. That represents a significantly higher cost. I believe the person who requests the copy should pay these costs; instead, the County Clerk is forced to spread the cost to all of us. Travesty.

August 9, 2007 at 9:20 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

tkdman (anonymous) says...

I think that 20 cents profit per copy is quite capable of covering the additional expense for the "over worked office personel" of the county

August 9, 2007 at 7:07 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

thecondoguy1 (anonymous) says...

pc, please.... they have had to do all that for over a century now that is there job, that is their function, if anybody could set up a effiecient fair but profitable copy system it would be them, they have a monopoly therefore go on to gouge the public with this profit center. Give me a break in their history it has only been the past 30 years where the public needed these copies for one reason or another. There has to be a better way...........it's 2007 not 1967...........

August 10, 2007 at 9:18 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

whyquestion (anonymous) says...

haven't TAX $s already paid their salary and for supplies???WHY charge double???

August 10, 2007 at 1:59 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Post a comment (Requires free registration)

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.