Our View: Upside-down salaries

Advertisement

Disentangling the knotted rope that is Colorado’s set of rules for increasing the salaries of elected officials isn’t easy. If it were, the state Legislature would have long since approved a pay increase for the governor, state treasurer and attorney general, positions that haven’t seen pay raises since 1999. And Routt County may have already been able to ensure the salaries of its elected officials aren’t lower than their own employees in some cases.

Steamboat Today editorial board — January to April 2014

  • Suzanne Schlicht, COO and publisher
  • Lisa Schlichtman, editor
  • Tom Ross, reporter
  • Karl Gills, community representative
  • Will Melton, community representative

Contact the editorial board at 970-871-4221 or editor@SteamboatToday.com. Would you like to be a member of the board? Fill out a letter of interest now.

The Denver Post reported in March 2013 that state Attorney General John Suthers earns  $80,000 per year, and Secretary of State Scott Gessler earns $68,500. They are among the elected officials in Colorado who make substantially less than their counterparts in neighboring states.

It’s a similar situation for elected officials in Routt County who make far less on average than non-elected county department heads, and in some cases, less than the top employees in their own departments. The Routt County commissioners, who earn $58,500 annually,  voted last week to ask the state Legislature, under the state constitution, to pass a bill that would restore balance to the pay structure in Routt County, and we approve.

It’s appropriate that elected officials in Colorado are effectively barred from increasing their own salaries;  their compensation cannot be increased in mid-term, and a pay raise requires an act of the Legislature. But the process has become a political football in the Centennial State.

In Routt County, retiring County Clerk Kay Weinland and County Assessor Gary Peterson also make $58,500, the same as the county commissioners. But both of those elected officials are making less than a few of their employees. That’s an undesirable situation that creates a strong disincentive for the most qualified candidates to run for county office in the future.

Peterson observed this month that if a position opened in his department, he could realize a significant raise by resigning and applying for the job.

Routt County Sheriff Garrett Wiggins makes $76,000, and would earn $87,700 if Routt County’s classification were upgraded. That salary still would be less than any of non-elected department heads, who average more than $100,000 annually, and in most cases, supervise fewer employees and smaller budgets. 

That’s part of the reason we approve of the vote taken by the three commissioners last week to prevail upon Colorado’s legislative leaders to take up a late bill before this session ends May 7, to elevate Routt County from a Class 3 county to a Class 2 county. That step would open the door for future salary raises for the sheriff, the county clerk, assessor, treasurer, coroner and surveyor.

Earlier this legislative session, a more timely bill to change Routt County’s salary classification was in the works until legislators from other parts of the state attached the issue of increased compensation for state elected officials to it. It quickly bogged down in the face of politics.

Should the Legislature prove unable to meet the deadline or unwilling to pass the law, those county officials, who saw their last pay raise in 2007, wouldn’t see another before 2019.

Routt currently is among 20 Category 3 counties along with Rio Blanco, San Miguel, Grand, Gunnison, Montrose and Moffat among others.

Just ahead of Routt, in Category 2, where elected county officials earn higher salaries, are counties such as Fremont, Mesa, Summit, La Plata, Pitkin, Eagle and Garfield.

We think that by 2019, the current situation, in which two of the county assessor’s employees already earn more than he does, will have become untenable. The county commissioners took the right path when they asked the state Legislature to approve a late bill that would allow Routt to offer its elected officials salaries that are commensurate with Colorado counties like Summit, Eagle, La Plata, Pitkin, Garfield — all counties that are either home to major tourism destinations or house the people who work at nearby resorts.

Comments

Scott Wedel 7 months, 1 week ago

We are supposed to feel for all of these elected officials willing to spend so much to stay in office.

So how long is this list of local elected officials whom couldn't live on their pay and resigned to take a private sector job? If this "issue" of being underpaid is so serious then surely we have a substantial list of highly qualified officials resigning due to a lack of pay.

Oh, not a single local elected official resigned to take a better paying private sector job.

0

Ken Mauldin 7 months, 1 week ago

I believe we would get better local government if we made all local elected positions part-time and paid minimum wage. Turning public service into a lucrative and powerful career choice has not been beneficial to the tax-paying public at-large.

I'm sure many elected officials would reply "But we wouldn't get as much done if we only worked part-time at these issues."

Bingo.

1

Ken Mauldin 7 months, 1 week ago

I would exempt the County Sheriff from this proposal and keep that local elected position full-time with a nominal wage.

0

mark hartless 7 months, 1 week ago

When you're doing evil, the taxpayers are better off if you do less of it...

0

Scott Wedel 7 months, 1 week ago

And part of the problem is that the county jobs are located in higher wage Steamboat. If county opened work offices in Hayden or South Routt then these wages become among the best local salaried jobs.

0

jerry carlton 7 months, 1 week ago

Supposed to be "public service". If you can not afford to provide public service, do not run for the job. Then maybe some of old goats with retirement could run for the office and have a chance of winning. Just proves some employees are making too much money regardless of the rigged employee surveys.. Wouldn't that be a hoot, a bunch of old goats running Routt County and the city? Might bring some fiscal responsibility into the mix.

0

Chris Hadlock 7 months, 1 week ago

Ken,

I agree and would add term limits and campaign finance reform. These politicians have a nasty habit of spending their campaign contributions on personal expenses and maintain a large account to attack anyone that runs against them.

We should make ALL candidates start with fresh fundraising 1 year prior to the election and any unspent campaign funds should revert to the Gov't agency that the candidate was running for with the sole purpose of reducing debt.

1

Kevin Nerney 7 months, 1 week ago

Jerry, I agree and you beat me to the punch so I can't add anything. Ken, Why is the Sheriff an elected position anyway? Local Police Chief's are promoted from within and the Fire Chief is not an elected office.

0

Ken Mauldin 7 months, 1 week ago

The Sheriff is the highest ranking LEO officer in the county and holds too much authority for the selection to be delegated to a representative council. Electing the Sheriff provides both independence from a board or council and the public oversight of the office.

0

Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.