Steamboat Springs School Board members: Amendment facts


On Oct. 14, the Steamboat Springs School Board discussed Amendment 66. Many community members on both sides of the issue expressed their opinions. The board finally voted, 3-1, to not support Amendment 66. A resolution to oppose the amendment was not brought forward.

Following are some important facts concerning this amendment and the related Senate Bill 213:

■ School funding in Colorado would be expanded from solely depending on property tax to also benefiting from an income tax. Income tax rates would increase from 4.63 to 5 percent on the first $75,000 of taxable income and to 5.9 percent on any taxable income at higher than $75,000.

■ By some conservative estimates, $6.7 million would be raised in our district and $1.5 million would return to our district.

■ If passed, our district’s funding would increase from the current $6,640 per pupil to $7,020 per pupil.

■ Funds would be shared equally with state charter schools. These funds would be for programs serving gifted and talented students, English language learners, special education, full-day kindergarten and early childhood education.

■ The school funding formula would be changed to eliminate the cost-of-living factor while placing more emphasis on at-risk students who are more expensive to educate. The elimination of the cost-of-living factor especially impacts Colorado resort communities and accounts for a considerable reduction in our district’s share of the state funds.

■ Districts impacted by the elimination of the cost-of-living factor will be allowed to appeal to the voters at a later time for a tax mill levy override to replace the resulting reduction in funds.

In conclusion, Amendment 66 has many benefits for the state of Colorado as a whole. Steamboat Springs School District will see an increase of about $1.5 million. This follows four years of budget cuts amounting to more than $ 4 million. Long-term funding is not addressed by this amendment. As a result, whether this amendment passes, our district still will need to address future education expenses with either further program cuts or by raising revenue from mill levy overrides and/or Education Fund Board sales tax increases.

Steamboat Springs School Board members


babette dickson 3 years, 6 months ago

"Why 2/3 of our tax contribution should be sent to Denver schools" and others rural schools?

"--because that's the way a civilized society works. Sometimes you give more than you get; sometimes you get more than you give. Why should students in poorer counties get a worse education than ours just because of where they live?"

Aren't we a civilized district with civilized BOE members?

Teachers will know how to effectively use 1.5 million in their classes, no worries.

Vote Yes A66


babette dickson 3 years, 6 months ago

Did anyone ever estimate how much money some community members / organizations send to Africa, South America? I know many of them and, they graciously donate more than $150 per year.

Steamboat loves Uganda, Kenya, Haiti, Costa Rica... Thousands and thousands of dollars are wired overseas to build schools, churches, administrative salaries....

BUT, how about our own backyard full of children in need of an appropriate education: ell, sped, at-risk... at the cost of $150 per year!

Your vote for A66 is about our backyard. Let's take care of it first.


Scott Wedel 3 years, 6 months ago

I think the biggest problem with this funding increase is that it includes no reforms to force underperforming schools to show improvements.

Hayden, for instance, has had disastrous high school math test scores for years and there is nothing in this bill that will compel Hayden to improve.


Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.