Rob Douglas: Sexual identity politics and the Olympics

Advertisement

Political grandstanding may be the only remaining common denominator between the left and right in American politics.

Rob Douglas

Rob Douglas' column appears Fridays in the Steamboat Today. He can be reached at rdouglas@SteamboatToday.com.

Find more columns by Douglas here.

Just as it was wrong back in July for Sen. Lindsey Graham to call on the United States to boycott the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, because Russian President Vladimir Putin granted asylum to NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden, President Barack Obama’s decision this week to use the U.S. Olympic delegation as a political tool to oppose Russian laws against “nontraditional sexual relations” is shortsighted.

First, some background. As reported by the Los Angeles Times this week:

“President Obama’s decision to send two openly gay athletes to the 2014 Sochi Olympics as part of the U.S. delegation continued to reverberate Wednesday.

“Christine Brennan, a columnist for USA Today, called the move ‘genius.’ The Human Rights First organization referred to it as a ‘positive message.’

“On the other end of the spectrum, veteran Olympic reporter Alan Abrahamson criticized Obama for playing politics in the sports realm and potentially jeopardizing an American bid for the 2024 Games.

“The choice of delegates is seen as a strong response to recent Russian legislation that threatens prosecution for anyone who promotes ‘nontraditional sexual relations’ in the presence of minors. Critics worldwide have spoken out against the law, saying it effectively bans events such as gay rights parades.”

Further, according to the Times:

“The U.S. will send tennis great Billie Jean King and hockey player Caitlin Cahow — both openly gay — along with several government officials. The delegation's other athletes include figure skating gold medalist Brian Boitano and speed skaters Eric Heiden and Bonnie Blair.

“Sochi will mark the first time since 2000 that the U.S. delegation will not include a president, former president, vice president or first lady.

“The French and German presidents had previously announced that they will not attend the Games.”

As the last sentence notes, Obama isn’t the only head of state who will skip the Olympics because of the Russian government’s position on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights. And Obama isn’t the first U.S. president to use the Olympic Games to make a political statement.

But with Obama personally boycotting the Olympics because of the host country’s laws regarding sexual norms that are still evolving in almost every country around the world — including here at home — he has opened the U.S. to charges of hypocrisy.

For example, only 17 states and the District of Columbia currently allow same-sex marriage. In many of those states the right to marry came from a court, not a ballot box or legislature. American opinion of LGBT rights, while shifting in favor of the LGBT community, remains deeply divided and highly controversial. Notably, Obama’s personal view on same-sex marriage didn’t “evolve” to the point of public support until May 2012 — just 19 months ago.

Given Obama’s very recent and politically suspect support of same-sex marriage, and the still intense generational division when it comes to the recognition of LGBT rights in the U.S., Obama’s boycott lacks the personal integrity and national unity necessary to influence Russia or any other country.

Nonetheless, Obama has calculated that personally boycotting the Olympics while sending openly gay athletes as leaders of the U.S. Olympic delegation is an advantageous way to call attention to indefensible laws impacting the LGBT community in Russia. In so doing, Obama’s gambit to shame Russia may have the unintended consequence of focusing global attention on inequality when it comes to LGBT rights in America.

Still, no matter what their personal views are when it comes to LGBT rights in Russia, the U.S. or anywhere else in the world, I suspect most Americans and Olympic athletes would prefer that the Olympics be about athletic competition, not sexual identity politics.

To reach Rob Douglas, email rdouglas@SteamboatToday.com

Comments

Scott Wedel 4 months ago

Russia's laws do not merely fail to give LGBT equal rights. The laws not only make it illegal to be LGBT, but oppress everyone's speech by prohibiting speaking in support of LGBT issues.

Which is why the leaders of other major countries are also not attending. The leaders of France and Germany are not attending and yet are opposed to gay marriage, Russia's laws are too oppressive to be accepted even by those opposed to gay marriage. Thus, it should be clear that the line that Russia's laws have crossed is not some standard of sexual identity politics, but a general standard of freedom of expression and freedom of association.

The fact that other the leaders of other major countries are not attending means it is ridiculous to suggest that not attending puts into jeopardy the USA's bid for hosting future Olympics. Between Russia's hosting of the Winter Olympics and Qatar hosting the 2022 World Cup with their rampant abuse of migrant workers, no future major international sporting event will be awarded without considering the host country's human rights situation.

1

mark hartless 4 months ago

Lindsey Graham and Barack Obama have much in common. One thing in particular is that they have both been in Washington at least 5 years too long.

0

Doug Starkey 4 months ago

Another shallow slam piece by Douglas, lacking in any substance or even the fortitude to take his own stance. What would you do if you were President Rob? Go yourself, boycott? Or simply find a way to continue your "political grandstanding"?

0

Ken Collins 4 months ago

Can it be possible, folks, that the US delegation is sending good, qualified folks that just happen to have a few from the LGBT community? The national % of LGBTs in America makes it likely that when you send a certain number, you will be sending a certain number of LGBTs. So what? Does everything have to be a political/moral issue? King, Boitano and the others are good delegates and great athletes and fine people. I saw a King interview and she was against any boycott. She wants the US there to support any Russian athletes or supporters of the equal rights movement. That is why she and the others are going. They are good ambassadors for America and the human race.

0

Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.