Archive for Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Steamboat School Board, City Council discuss Proposition 103
Advertisement
Steamboat Springs During a brief joint meeting Tuesday, Steamboat Springs School Board members told their City Council counterparts that passage of the statewide Proposition 103 could prevent district budget cuts for the next several years. The School Board, which unanimously endorsed Proposition 103 last week, did not ask the council to do the same.
The statewide income and sales tax increase would raise an estimated $2.9 billion for public schools in Colorado over a five-year period before sunsetting. If passed by voters in November, the Colorado Center on Law and Policy estimates Proposition 103 would net the Steamboat school district $1.2 million annually.
Anticipating a 4 to 5 percent reduction in state funding next school year, Superintendent Brad Meeks, who addressed the council with board members Brian Kelly and Laura Anderson, said extra revenue from Proposition 103 likely would allow his district to break even.
“If Proposition 103 went through, that would basically offset the cuts we’re expecting and hold us stable for the next five years,” Meeks told the council.
Councilman Kenny Reisman asked the board members how Proposition 103’s passage or failure would affect students in Steamboat.
“We’ve protected programs so far, but there were several that were in question last year,” Anderson said. “I can’t say yet where we’re going to have to cut, but the impacts are coming, and this is going to be a tough year for us.”
Councilman Walter Magill said it will be a tough year for voters to approve any tax increase.
“It’s a worthy cause, but a lot of people are hurting financially,” he said. “It’s a tall order you’re under.”
City Council President Cari Hermacinski asked whether the board knew if it would be able to contribute to the salary of a school resource officer who works at Steamboat Springs High School. While the salary has been split by the school district and the city in previous years, Anderson said the school district currently is not contributing to it.
“Last year, we were faced with do we cut fifth-grade band, and the year before that, we looked at cutting counselors,” she said. “We would love to contribute (funds for the resource officer position) and go back to 50-50, but we don’t know if it’s going to shake out.”
— To reach Scott Franz, call 970-871-4210 or email scottfranz@SteamboatToday.com


Comments
however (anonymous) says...
I think you can stop running 'stories' of school districts that support proposition 103. A truly newsworthy story would be a district that opposes this proposition (HA). Meanwhile, I sit here trying to figure why we are allowed to keep any of the money we earn for ourselves. I guess it will just be a matter of time when we won't.
September 21, 2011 at 6:35 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
telivader (anonymous) says...
“If Proposition 103 went through, that would basically offset the cuts we’re expecting and hold us stable for the next five years,” Meeks told the council.
What happens in five years?
$2,900,000,000.00 box of band aids.
September 21, 2011 at 9:02 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
scottford (Scott Ford) says...
This discussion was a bit silly. The Superintendent and the two school board members present seemed ill prepared. They had a perfect opportunity to highlight what the Steamboat Springs School District was doing. Three highlights and three challenges is all they needed to start talking about.
Instead they sat down, after a introductions they just stared at the City Council members - I guess waiting for something to happen. After a few moments of awkward silence - A CC member asked them a question about this year's enrollment.
It was meant to be an update from the school district. These representative from the school district had the lead to begin the discussion. Surely there is something going on in the School District that two board members and the superintendent wanted to share with City Council.
It was just goofy - and lasted maybe 20 minutes of Q&A and a lot of rambling . Thankfully following a series of questions about the school district's ability to fund at least a portion of the cost of the Community Resource Officer, Cari asked the CC members if they had any more questions. They all nodded no.
My expectation as citizen and taxpayer in the school district is that you have at least an elevator speech about what is going on. You can do better. This was an opportunity squandered.
September 21, 2011 at 10:15 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Post a comment (Requires free registration)
Posting comments requires a free account and verification.