Paula Stephenson: Yes to Proposition 103
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Routt County’s schools are some of the best performing and highest achieving in Colorado. However, that is about to change because the state is again proposing to balance its budget on the backs of Colorado’s students, cutting education funding by an additional $200 million to $500 million for fiscal year 2012-13. If nothing changes, this will be the fourth consecutive year of cuts our schools have experienced, and it will be the year that does long-term, permanent damage.
Proposition 103 seeks to stop the debilitating decline in education spending by providing a five-year timeout from school cuts. To do so, the state’s sales and income tax rates must be restored to 1999 levels (from 2.9 percent to 3 percent and from 4.63 percent to 5 percent). This will raise approximately $536 million per year for reinvestment in preschool, K-12 and higher education. After five years, rates will return to their current levels. For the average Coloradoan, Proposition 103 will cost one penny for every $10 spent on goods and less than 40 cents per day on earned income — a negligible but much-needed increase.
Throughout the past four years, Colorado has passed some of the broadest education reform in the nation. Yet during that same time, the state has reduced its education budget by more than $1.5 billion. The result is that our K-12 schools now have larger class sizes, fewer electives, fewer extracurricular activities and higher student fees. Our colleges and universities have lost professors and programs, no longer offer merit-based scholarships, provide limited need-based scholarships and have raised tuition by 43 percent.
Most people have heard that Colorado ranks 49th in the nation for education spending, but they don’t understand exactly what that means. It means that compared to the national average, Colorado’s education budget has been declining since 1988. It means our schools need an additional $1.3 billion annually to meet education standards and reforms mandated by state and federal law. It means Colorado already had a $17 billion education funding gap before three years of cuts. It means Colorado’s schools constantly are being asked to do more with less, and it means our schools now are struggling to retain the basics.
Without the infusion of Proposition 103 revenue to stop the divestment in our education system, our schools won’t be innovating, and they won’t be implementing any new reforms. Without Proposition 103, Routt County’s schools will be forced to continue to shave millions from their budgets, cut essential people and vital programs and limit the educational opportunities for our children.
The unforeseen interaction of the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights and the Gallagher Amendment has driven down local revenues, ratcheted down local mill levies and forced the state to bear an increasing share of the cost of K-12 education while limiting its ability to pay for schools and other core governmental functions. Colorado needs a big, broad fix or things will get exponentially worse. Proposition 103 is not that fix. It is our only current option.
Proposition 103 is not an increase in funding. It is the only way to preserve the educational opportunities our children currently have. It is the only opportunity you, the voters, have to prevent Colorado’s budget woes from further damaging education in Colorado.
Vote yes on Proposition 103. Choose to keep Colorado competitive by investing in the foundation of our democracy — our kids, our schools and our communities.
Paula Stephenson
Executive director of the Colorado Rural Schools Caucus


Comments
Sandra Sharp 1 year, 7 months ago
Paula, Are you concerned that Proposition 103 does not designate how the additional funds will be distributed? Our schools may not receive any additional funding from 103. Also, we do have other ways to perserve the educational opportunities our children cureently have. We need to broaden our revenue base. Thanks!
Alan Geye 1 year, 7 months ago
This feels like one of those God, mother and apple pie arguments. Surely no one will argue against ensuring the best educational system possible for our kids, right? I surely do not have all the answers, but isn't it also possible that there's a structural problem in our educational system? Is it possible that public education has become a sacred cow that just might be restructured to achieve better results? Nationally, we are spending more money per student than ever before and teacher pupil ratios are generally getting smaller, but the actual performance results are declining. Does anyone else sense a systemic issue that just might not relate to funding? Personally, I've never seen effective reform achieved by throwing more money at any system (corporate or governmental) without first thoughtfully and completely challenging the existing paradigm.
Heidi O'Connell 1 year, 7 months ago
Lack of money is Not the problem with our school system. Start with the board of education and the teachers union
rhys jones 1 year, 7 months ago
Teacher tenure is a big yet unspoken part of this issue. While supposedly protecting teachers by allowing wider approaches, the net effect is sanctioning incompetence. The chair of the business department at my alma mater was an bug-eyed, incompetent LLD lecher who never practiced law and traded grades for sex to the fairer half. The college president had a far better legal grasp, the one time we compared notes, and the next year we had a new department head.
So when I see higher $$/student ratios, and lower teacher/pupil ratios, combined with lower assessments, I have to question either the quality of instruction, or the students' motivation, or both. If the former, I hardly agree with further subsidizing an already-flawed system. If the latter, the system will "weed out" non-achievers, Wendy's always needs help, and those who want the knowledge will find a way to get it.
Say no.
Requires free registration
Posting comments requires a free account and verification.
Or login with:
OpenID