Our View: Reasonable noise policy is possible

Advertisement

Editorial Board, January through May 8, 2011

  • Scott Stanford, general manager
  • Brent Boyer, editor
  • Tom Ross, reporter
  • Traci Day, community representative
  • Dean Vogelaar, community representative

Contact the editorial board at 970-871-4221 or editor@SteamboatToday.com. Would you like to be a member of the board? Fill out a letter of interest now.

The Steamboat Springs City Council is right to pursue a noise ordinance that is enforceable, easy to understand and respectful of downtown residents and businesses. The existing ordinance fails those guidelines, as does the city’s first attempt at revising it. The state of Colorado’s rules, which would take effect in the absence of a city ordinance, are even worse.

A vibrant nightlife with live music and other entertainment is a key community component. So, too, is a mix of downtown residences. Both can peacefully co-exist with a little common sense.

Here’s how the city could get there: Tweak the noise ordinance by raising the decibel limits for commercial zones, including downtown, to the same as those for light industrial zones. Also, require complainants to first take reasonable steps to abate the noise — closing a window or door, for example — before a violation occurs.

Efforts to rewrite the noise ordinance are the direct result of an ongoing dispute between the Ghost Ranch Saloon and Howelsen Place. Ghost Ranch Saloon is a bar and live music venue downtown. Howelsen Place is a mix of commercial and residential units. Howelsen Place is directly across Seventh Street from the saloon, and at least one condominium owner has complained about noise from the Ghost Ranch Saloon late at night, especially when the door to the nightclub is opened.

The owner of Ghost Ranch thinks he already has done enough — $700,000 in sound-proofing — to prevent noise issues. The Howelsen Place condo owner thinks that, on multiple occasions, Ghost Ranch has violated the ordinance. Some on the City Council seem to think Ghost Ranch could fix the problem by spending about $50,000 on a vestibule for its entrance; ironically, Ghost Ranch says it offered that during construction but was denied by the city because of easement issues.

Most people can’t define decibels. Here’s the best we can do — 60 decibels is comparable to normal conversation; double that and you get the sound of a jet engine.

The current city ordinance allows for a maximum of 60 decibels between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. and a maximum of 55 decibels from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. The City Council’s first attempt at revising the ordinance would allow for as much as 65 decibels from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. and for 60 decibels from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m.

We would increase that slightly to match the rules for light industrial zoning, allowing for 70 decibels from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. and 65 decibels from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. A little louder than conversation but a lot quieter than a jet engine.

Capt. Joel Rae, of the Steamboat Springs Police Department, said it’s impossible to bring a prosecutable noise violation case to court under the current ordinance. Evidence gathering is simply too difficult, Rae said, because the ordinance requires that the decibel level persist for 15 minutes.

The new ordinance would strike that. Any noise measured above the decibels authorized for the specific time of day would constitute a violation, punishable by increasing fines and, potentially, the loss of a restaurant’s liquor license. We don’t disagree with that, especially at the higher decibel limits.

The new law states the decibel level will be measured at the complainant’s property line. That’s not really fair. A downtown resident should not be able to stifle nightlife because he wants peace and quiet while he kicks it on his balcony at 1 a.m. Go inside and close the windows. If it’s still too loud, by all means call in a complaint.

Noise ordinance variances here are common, the city says, and they allow events such as the Steamboat Springs Pro Rodeo and the Steamboat Springs Free Summer Concert Series to go on without breaking the law. Obviously, such a liberal variance policy should continue for events downtown.

We want downtown to be a vibrant, at times even noisy, place. We also want it to be an attractive place to live. There’s no reason to think both can’t happen with a pragmatic approach to our noise ordinance.

Comments

Brian Smith 3 years, 5 months ago

This article is on the right track, but I personally would like to see our city take a more progressive pro business/tourism approach similar to what a successful thriving place as Austin, TX has done and make the decibels a minimum of 70 after 11PM. As this article also states, it is a MUST that the complaining party attempt to mitigate the noise themselves by closing windows/doors etc. Another must in my opinion is the fact that the measurement should be done from the balcony or whatever location the complaint is coming from. Totally unfair to take this measurement as the ordinance stands now.

0

addlip2U 3 years, 5 months ago

......." complainants to first take reasonable steps to abate the noise — closing a window or door, for example — before a violation occurs."

Requiring complainants to first take reasonable steps to abate the noise — closing a window or door, for example — before a violation occurs....is preposterous.

How many other noise ordinances (if any) require affected residential homeowner to take any steps to abate noise pollution from their neighbor?

Before proposing a remedy the Editorial Board should do a little research.

0

kyle pietras 3 years, 5 months ago

This rag is loosing touch! Let's see what do people care about today? Maybe that the mt. is closing with more snow than ever before. Most locals dragged their kids into a snow storm to ski a bit more pow for the last day of chairlift season. Why is the today trying to influence instead of being impartial?

0

exduffer 3 years, 5 months ago

Sounds a little like the DIA situation. I moved here now move your take off route!

0

Fred Duckels 3 years, 5 months ago

Those who have had too much to drink can be loud and obnoxious and that will never be easy to swallow.

0

Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.