Our View: County was right to put off TDR plan

Advertisement

Editorial Board, April 2010 to Aug. 8, 2010

  • Suzanne Schlicht, publisher
  • Brent Boyer, editor
  • Blythe Terrell, city editor
  • Tom Ross, reporter
  • Towny Anderson, community representative
  • Tatiana Achcar, community representative

Contact the editorial board at (970) 871-4221 or editor@steamboatpilot.com. Would you like to be a member of the board? Fill out a letter of interest now.

On Tuesday, the Routt County Board of Commissioners made the right decision when it voted to table plans for a transfer of development rights program.

The three commissioners decided unanimously to set aside the measure indefinitely. That was a wise move, particularly as questions remain about how best to handle growth in the areas surrounding Steamboat Springs.

Here’s what the county was considering: The transfer of development rights regulations would provide a mechanism for conserving rural parcels. That would be accomplished by shifting development potential from parcels proposed for conservation to designated areas close to the city limits through a private transaction between landowners but approved by the county. The draft regulations the commissioners were considering could have created about 250 5-acre home sites in a crescent shape around the north side of Steamboat Springs, wrapping to the western edge of the urban growth boundary.

Some have said the proposal amounts to urban sprawl. At the hearing Tuesday, several residents raised concerns about designating specific receiving areas. North Routt rancher Jay Fetcher suggested that the county would be influencing the value of land within those receiving areas if it adopted the plan, by deciding that certain pieces of land could contain 5-acre parcels while other areas would be limited to 35-acre parcels.

We think there’s value in continued discussion of a transfer of development rights plan. As County Planning Director Chad Phillips noted at the commissioners’ meeting, a TDR plan was part of the West of Steamboat Springs Area Plan and the Steamboat Springs Area Community Plan. The city and county collaborated closely on those documents, and TDRs deserve the same level of collaboration and cooperation. Another part of the discussion, currently absent, is transfer of development rights to developable parcels within city limits. This apparently was the intent of TDR programs as implemented in other counties in Colorado — rural to urban rather than rural to rural.

We don’t think there’s any reason to rush. The Routt County community was given a big timeout when the real estate market cooled, so we have ample time to proceed with forethought and planning.

And we have to proceed.

On April 11, this Editorial Board wrote about our concerns that the city hasn’t delved into the “why” question after city voters emphatically rejected Steamboat 700. Perhaps this transfer of development rights discussion serves as a natural jumping-off point into that crucial conversation. On April 11, we wrote this about a city-county joint meeting to discuss TDR: “Maybe April 20 is the start of an honest look into the reasons our community said ‘no’ to Steamboat 700. The TDR discussion certainly plays into the same larger issue of growth.”

We still think so, and we eagerly await the city and county’s next move in the ongoing debate about where and, more important, how this community grows.

Comments

Steve Lewis 4 years, 7 months ago

Agreed.

"HOW and WHERE Steamboat is going to grow" is already well addressed in the plans, which are still completely valid. The Pilot, watching its real estate advertising business dry up, is beginning to sweat about the WHEN.

"Eagerly waiting" for the "crucial conversation" to begin changing our plans, is a sad sign that our local paper would treat this valley like a commodity, to be shaped to grow more development. An option I prefer would be attending to better living with what we have now, sustainably, and letting growth come in its own time. This valley is excellent with or without growth, in case they haven't noticed.

"Upside down" applies to far too many things around us today. Let's let the dust settle a year or two until things are solidly "right side up" and we can actually see which parts of our compass have survived this mess. Until we have gained some trust in the next directions shaping both our valley and our country, the Pilot's is a foolish and self-serving errand.

0

Fred Duckels 4 years, 7 months ago

Steve, If it were not for the realestate advertising you would have not a place to voice your disdain, or call for the censorship of others. This TDR plan has been for the most part an ambush, and should be given time much like the 700 for community education. I choose not to hide my head in the sand since the economy is slow, but planninng as far ahead as possible is necessary. Looking far down the road is necessary in any business and I do not see this situation differently.

0

peevla 4 years, 7 months ago

Hi Am I just dreaming but didn't Alpine Land get this privilege and no-one else in the County? How do you spell malfeasance? Who got paid off?

0

Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.