Our View: Preparing for the worst in school budget cuts


Editorial Board, October 2009 through February 2010

  • Suzanne Schlicht, general manager
  • Brent Boyer, editor
  • Blythe Terrell, city editor
  • Tom Ross, reporter
  • Michelle Garner, community representative
  • Paula Cooper Black, community representative

Contact the editorial board at (970) 871-4221 or editor@steamboatpilot.com. Would you like to be a member of the board? Fill out a letter of interest now.

— Significant cuts to state education spending are going to hit hard in public school districts across Colorado, including our three school systems in Routt County. Advance planning and open communication with residents will help ease the pain of the cuts and may lead to thoughtful solutions for minimizing the impact in classrooms.

It’s encouraging to see that our local districts already are preparing for the worst. Indeed, the news they’re getting from Denver isn’t good. State lawmakers are estimating $150 million in cuts to K-12 spending for the 2010-11 school year. That total balloons to $260 million if one includes $110 million in previously allocated education funding that since has been rescinded. The cuts could go deeper depending on an updated state revenue analysis expected in March.

With education spending occupying 43.3 percent of the state’s general fund budget, there’s simply no way lawmakers can reduce a projected $1 billion to $1.4 billion deficit without slashing funds to the biggest line item expenditure. Assuming districts will have less money to spend, the question becomes how those cuts will be enacted at the district and school level.

State Sen. Al White, R-Hayden, a member of the Joint Budget Committee and former member of the House Education Committee, urged districts to minimize cuts to core educational programming. Steamboat Springs School Board President Robin Crossan echoed that sentiment.

“We’re all in agreement that we want to keep the cuts as far away from the classroom as possible,” Crossan said Tuesday before adding that “no stone will be left unturned.”

Crossan and her fellow board members held a two-day work session last week that included significant time devoted to budget discussions. Budget conversations also dominated last week’s Hayden School Board meeting. And on Tuesday, the South Routt School Board held a special public meeting to discuss its projected revenue shortfall for the 2010-11 school year, which could reach nearly $500,000.

We’re encouraged by these proactive discussions in all three school districts. But we also know it will take creative ideas and community buy-in to help our schools make it through the next couple of years without experiencing significant impacts to the quality of education we offer students.

Here are a few ideas to consider:

■ The Education Fund Board should consider temporarily adjusting its typical allocation process and instead provide funding to all three districts to reinstitute cut programs or positions.

■ Districts should explore increased partnerships with other educational institutions, such as Colorado Mountain College, to offer high-level courses that could be cut from local high schools.

■ Districts should consider the role increased community involvement — think parent volunteers, for example — can play in supplementing regular educational programming, particularly where potential staff cuts could minimize the adult presence in classrooms and schools.

We’re sure there are many other ideas our education professionals and community members will offer up during the coming months. We urge Routt County’s school districts to create opportunities for that public input to be heard. And perhaps as important, we think district officials should put forth the effort to create easy-to-understand documentation about school budgets and the associated costs of providing specific programs and services. For example, what does $1 million buy? What is the cost of trash removal services, special education services, school transportation services, gifted and talented programs? Providing line-item budget summaries would go a long way to helping the community understand how taxpayer money is spent on public education, and thus, the scope of the looming budget cuts.

We’re fortunate to have strong public school systems in Routt County, but they aren’t immune to the dire fiscal situation at the state level. Working together, and working proactively, will help keep our schools strong during the economic crisis. That effort must continue in earnest.


Richard Hagins 7 years, 2 months ago

At a forum during the last commissioners’ election in 2006, the candidates were asked, “If they would support consolidating all three Routt County school districts into one district?” They were stumped and thought it was an interesting idea, but I would have to look at it further before commenting.

With the school districts’ cutting their budgets, now would be the time in forming, “Routt County School District”. This would be the most logical thing to do for the students and residents of the county.


Scott Wedel 7 years, 2 months ago

And while it may make sense for Hayden's school district to remain, there are much stronger reasons for consolidating SoRoCo into SB school district.

The are many Stagecoach kids (in SoRoCo district) at SB schools. And that would be the case even if SoRoCo elementary school was considered to be just as good or better as the ones in SB because there are parents that work in SB where it is far easier to deal with a school emergency (such as sick kid) in SB than 40 minutes away in Yampa. And then at point does a parent take their kid out of SB school and put them into SoRoCo?

And what does a parent do about high school when of AP English, AP History, AP Chemistry or (and?) Calculus becomes an independent study?

It is not an issue with the quality of South Routt schools. It is a question of the location of population and just how few students there are at the high school. The number of students above 90th percentile should be about 3 which is just too few to have academic peer support.

Hayden is larger and the district is in the middle of it's student base and may be viable on it's own. SoRoCo has issues due to much of it's student base is at the northern edge and it has a small population base.

To the extent that a Stagecoach charter school might reduce the number of kids going to SB, it would also eviscerate the number of students at SoRoCo Elementary in Yampa. . The question of consolidation needs to be analyzed district by district.


Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.