Elk River meeting today
City Council’s discussion Tuesday about water resources development was brief, but did include notice of a public meeting at 5 p.m. today at the Steamboat Springs Community Center to talk about the over-appropriated status of the Elk River.
Erin Light, Division 6 water engineer for the state Department of Natural Resources, said that status will be implemented for the Elk on Jan. 1. She said tonight’s meeting is intended to provide information to property owners and water users about impacts of the river’s changing status. One primary impact, she said, will be much tighter regulations for new well permits. Those who have questions but are unable to attend tonight can call Light at 970-879-0272.
Light said the Colorado Water Conservation Board made a call on the Elk this fall, from Sept. 15 to Oct. 7, after the river’s flow rate dipped below 65 cubic feet per second. A “call” on a river can require release of water from holders of water rights that are junior to the party making the call. Light said entities including Strawberry Park Hot Springs and Marabou Ranch were affected by the call, which was triggered by the conservation board’s monitoring of the river’s flow.
- Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 5 p.m.
- Steamboat Springs Community Center, 1605 Lincoln Ave., Steamboat Springs
Steamboat Springs City officials nudged Colorado Mountain College’s proposed construction project forward Tuesday night, but they’re not ready to release the reins quite yet.
The Steamboat Springs City Council voted, 5-2, to give initial support to dissolving the city’s intergovernmental agreement with CMC. But as the college prepares to build a 50,000-square-foot classroom and administrative building on its Alpine Campus in Steamboat Springs, council members expressed a desire to retain some control over that building, which would sit near neighborhoods filled with concerned residents who spoke in Centennial Hall about potential construction and traffic problems.
So as City Council gave initial approval to dissolving the intergovernmental agreement — which requires the college to go through the city planning process for development — the council also directed city staff to prepare a separate document that would hold CMC accountable to standards for items including landscaping, signage, road construction and sidewalk maintenance related to the new building.
A final vote on dissolving the intergovernmental agreement likely will be pushed to Jan. 4. The document detailing construction standards essentially would take the place of the agreement.
City attorney Tony Lettunich advised City Council of the no-going-back nature of dissolving the agreement, which was signed in 1997 and guided construction of a CMC residence hall.
“If the IGA is terminated, you really have little control over what the college does — they (would be) required to follow state requirements,” Lettunich said. “Under state statute, they can discuss with you what they’re going to do, but you don’t have any control over approving or not approving what they do.
“I think the city needs to identify what it’s important for CMC to commit to, and then bring that forward when you terminate this IGA,” Lettunich continued.
That work already is under way.
City planner Seth Lorson said city staff is working with CMC on issues including construction and maintenance of a sidewalk on 12th Street.
Sarah Lara, involved in program management for CMC, also noted that collaboration and said the college is more than willing to work with the city on standards for the new building. She said in requesting dissolution of the agreement — which CMC has with no other municipality in its system — CMC is asking to be treated like a school district rather than a developer.
Some residents near the college said the agreement should be kept in place.
“There is absolutely no incentive for the city to dissolve it,” Buckskin Drive resident Heather DeVos said. “What’s in there that you wouldn’t want to uphold?”
Council members Meg Bentley and Kenny Reisman voted against Tuesday’s initial support of the dissolution, saying the construction standards and other questions should be resolved first.
One of those questions, also debated Tuesday, is whether the Crawford Spur secondary access road should be private or public. Steamboat Springs Fire Marshal Jay Muhme recommended it be public for “fire and life safety” reasons.
Also drawing a crowd Tuesday was City Council’s preliminary discussion about “complete street” regulations, which would require new development projects to evaluate pedestrian access, transit, cycling and more.
The idea received praise from groups including cycling advocates and supporters of alternative transportation.
“I’m here tonight to urge you to move ahead on this in whatever way you feel is best,” said Routt County Commissioner Diane Mitsch Bush, who serves on several transportation-related boards and committees. “This is an economic development tool.”
Mitsch Bush said regulation efforts improve property values and create communities that are attractive to families and young workers.
Some council members questioned the potential costs such an ordinance could create for developers. Councilman Jon Quinn asked whether it would affect single-family homeowners seeking to do a small remodel.
City engineer Janet Hruby said that question “isn’t specifically addressed” in the draft ordinance.
“The intent wasn’t that single-family homeowners would have to build a section of sidewalk,” she said. “The intent is not for individual homes so much as a streetscape.”
Hruby said those questions and others could be addressed in a formal ordinance that could enter the city approval process in January.
City Council members supported that idea.
“We’ll look forward to our Planning Commission going over this with a fine-tooth comb,” City Council President Cari Hermacinski said.