To the citizens of Northwest Colorado:
I have received a lot of grumbling, and frankly, downright anger this year from many of you. I'm hopeful that with a little explanation, I might help you better understand why I have done some of the things that seem to have you so upset.
First of all, you need to understand the operations of the Joint Budget Committee, of which I am one of six members. There are three members from each chamber, two Democratic senators, one Republican senator (me), two House Democrats, and one House Republican. We started our 2009-10 budget process in early November, hearing from budget staffers about various department requests, and then we heard directly from the departments.
In December, when our quarterly revenue forecast was presented, we were told that our current-year budget, 2008-09, was going to see a revenue shortfall of $600 million, which meant we needed to figure out how to bring the current-year budget back into balance. With only six months left in that budget year, we made transfers from cash funds, reduced our statutory reserve in half and made the cuts we could even though we were halfway through the year. This drastic midyear re-balancing really represented writing a virtually new budget for the 2008-09 fiscal year, an unprecedented necessity.
Once that was complete, we went back to work on the 2009-10 budget for next fiscal year. We needed to make additional transfers, cuts and reductions to bring that budget to balance. This proved to be a more difficult task than originally anticipated, as the March revenue forecast showed further projected reductions in 2009-10 revenue. As a result, we had to consider many distasteful options. At one point we suggested cutting $300 million from higher education but had hoped to backfill that cut with money from Pinnacol Assurance Co.
Pinnacol is the state worker's compensation company, and it first appeared that as a state agency, we could access their surplus statutory reserve. Upon further investigation, it was shown that this wouldn't work, which sent us back to the deliberations. We all agreed that cutting higher education by $300 million really wasn't a workable solution, so we made other proposals, i.e. cutting K-12 education funding, doing away with the senior homestead exemption, cutting rates for Medicaid providers and furloughing state employees. In the end, we did all of these, as well as many other distasteful but necessary cuts and transfers. We tried to cut our own legislative salaries but were informed that we could neither increase nor decrease our own salaries and benefits during any session. Anything we do along those lines wouldn't take effect until the next General Assembly (2011).
The way JBC works is that we all can vote on the issues under consideration, but once they are adopted, they become part of our budget proposal. Once the budget bill is sent over from the JBC, though I may disagree with many provisions that it contains, I am obligated to vote for the bill. Last year, I was the only Republican in the House to do so. This year, I was the only Republican in the Senate to do so. It was my duty as a member of the committee.
I apologize to all of you who have been hurt by the budget decisions that were made this year. I have been told this year is the worst in several decades and possibly in the 50 years that the JBC has existed. Our hands are tied with many constitutional provisions that didn't exist 20 years ago, therefore we don't have the latitude prior JBC members have had.
To make matters worse, I am concerned that the 2010-11 budget might be even worse. There are no rabbits to pull out of our hat. If revenues don't improve, cuts that we considered but found ways around last time will have to happen. The budgetary pain will be felt statewide. Cuts will be deep and pervasive. I don't say this to frighten you, only to warn you of what the possibilities might be.
In the future, if you have any questions about the budget process, my proposals or actions, please don't hesitate to call me on my cell phone at 303-886-2537 or e-mail me at firstname.lastname@example.org. Believe it or not, there is more method than madness to my actions, once you understand the lay of the land and the rules and protocol under which I must operate. As difficult as it can be to serve on the JBC, it still is the most powerful committee in the Legislature, and it is where I have the most leverage to protect the interests of Northwest Colorado.
State Senator, R-Hayden