Archive for Thursday, March 12, 2009
West Steamboat growth outpaces expectations
Planning Commission to discuss build-out
Advertisement
If you go
What: Steamboat Springs Planning Commission meeting
When: 6 p.m. today
Where: Centennial Hall, 124 10th St.
Call: City planning offices at 871-8258 for more information
By the numbers
- 12,130: Full-time population of Steamboat Springs
- 9,180: Housing units in Steamboat
- 22,333: Steamboat's projected population in 2035
- 17,427: Projected housing units in 2035
- 1 to 2.4: Dwelling units per acre targeted in the West of Steamboat Springs Area Plan
- 4.8: Dwelling units per acre proposed in Steamboat 700 and 360 Village
Source: Steamboat Springs Department of Planning and Community Development
- Total wages Routt County
employers paid to individuals who live outside Routt County
1970 $1.5 million
1980 $2 million
1990 $15.4 million
2000 $32.4 million
2001 $37.1 million
2002 $42.7 million
2003 $40.9 million
2004 $44.1 million
2005 $47.9 million
2006 $47.1 million
Source: Yampa Valley Partners Community Indicators Project 2009-10 Report
Steamboat Springs Residential development west of 13th Street is occurring faster than the city expected, and the Steamboat Springs Planning Commission will be asked tonight to identify its target build-out for the area that includes two projects seeking annexation.
Steamboat 700 Project Manager Danny Mulcahy said the increase is a good thing that will help prevent sprawl in outlying areas of Routt County.
The city's West of Steamboat Springs Area Plan included about 1,100 acres of vacant land and a target build-out of 1,100 to 2,635 units, or 1 to 2.4 dwelling units per acre. Steamboat 700 and 360 Village are proposing more than 2,900 units on 620 of those acres, or 4.8 dwelling units per acre. The city also estimates an additional 925 dwelling units can be expected within existing city limits west of 13th Street.
"A lot of this higher number comes from infill. I don't want to lie this at the doorsteps of the annexation proposals," said Planning Services Manager John Eastman, who said even west-side industrial projects are increasingly incorporating residential components. "The unexpected outcomes are the result of being more successful at achieving infill development."
Eastman agreed with Mulcahy that the higher number of homes is a good thing that furthers stated community goals for higher density and more pedestrian- and transit-friendly neighborhoods. But allowing more homes also has infrastructure implications.
"I want to be really clear. That's not a bad thing. If anything, that's a positive outcome of the community plan," Eastman said about proposed increases in density. "We're checking with the community to see if they're OK with that. : That has a potential to cause a lot of concern from some people."
The city's planning staff is not making a recommendation on the build-out question, but needs an answer to move forward with transportation and fiscal impact studies. Mulcahy is upset with the way planners have couched the question, though. In its staff report and a newspaper advertisement, planning staff has stated that allowing the number of units proposed would require widening U.S. Highway 40 to six lanes while the WSSAP target requires only four lanes. Mulcahy said the city is contaminating the work of an ongoing transportation study by assuming its conclusions.
"They're not supposed to be presupposing," Mulcahy said. "There's a whole bunch of options the (study) can say."
Mulcahy said it would be a mistake to limit growth in the west Steamboat area and that doing so would be to promote scattered development in other areas of the county.
"We essentially force people into their cars," Mulcahy said. "If we limit the growth there, we are forcing people to drive into town. There's just no way around it. : I think density is to the community's benefit."


Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Post a comment (Requires free registration)
Posting comments requires a free account and verification.