Community Alliance pushes for annexation vote
Group launches petition drive for ballot question
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Steamboat Springs Members of the Community Alliance intend to hit the streets this weekend with a petition drive meant to ensure public votes on future major annexations to Steamboat Springs.
Steve Aigner, community organizer for the Community Alliance of the Yampa Valley, gave the Steamboat Springs City Council an ultimatum to that effect Tuesday night at Centennial Hall.
"If you don't decide this evening to instruct the city attorney to prepare an ordinance that would put on the fall ballot a proposal to amend the Home Rule Charter so that there will be a public vote on all substantial annexation, then starting tomorrow, the Community Alliance will initiate a petition drive to amend the Home Rule Charter," Aigner read from a prepared statement.
After leaving City Council chambers in Centennial Hall, he said things would begin to happen quickly.
"Tomorrow we intend to file a statement signed by five persons at the city clerk's office," Aigner said Tuesday night. "We should be in the streets with petitions by this weekend."
Council has set tentative dates of Sept. 22 and Oct. 13 for votes on first and second readings of an annexation ordinance for the Steamboat 700 proposal just west of city limits. The outcome of a Community Alliance ballot question would not be known until after those annexation votes. However, Tuesday's City Council agenda packet explained that a successful petition and ballot question could refer a Steamboat 700 annexation ordinance back to City Council for scheduling of a public vote on its fate.
Aigner began his remarks by reminding City Council that on July 7, Councilwoman Meg Bentley made a motion that her colleagues direct the city attorney to craft an ordinance that would amend the city charter to require a public vote on annexations. Councilman Steve Ivancie seconded her motion, which subsequently was defeated.
"In voting the motion down, 5-2, you seemed to dismiss the arguments made for the motion," Aigner told City Council. "We would like you to reconsider that motion and support it. Are you willing to do that this evening?"
Aigner's remarks came during the regular 7 p.m. time slot reserved for public comments on matters not on the agenda. City Council consistently has declined to discuss non-agenda items on the spot and met Aigner's question with impassive faces.
Asked after the meeting whether she approved of the course being plotted by the Community Alliance, Bentley said, "I do think it needs to be done."
Bentley said she had been a member of the Community Alliance for many years and added that Aigner had encouraged her to make her motion July 7. However, she said it was something she had contemplated from the time of her election to City Council in November 2007.
"Steve and I talked about it, but I'm not his front-woman," Bentley said. "I made the motion because I think the people need to have a voice in this. It will have a big impact on Steamboat Springs, and the people living here should have a direct say in it."
Aigner said he began broaching the subject of the petition drive with fellow Community Alliance members late last week. He said the group's board of directors unanimously supported the initiative.
Aigner declined to name the members of the board of directors without their prior approval.
The success of future ballot petition drives could be directly affected by a separate City Council vote Tuesday. Council members voted on first reading to pass an ordinance placing a question on the Nov. 3 ballot seeking to amend Article 8 of the city's Home Rule Charter. The ordinance would reduce the threshold for a successful petition from obtaining signatures of 20 percent of qualified voters in the last election to 10 percent in conformance with the state constitution.

Comments
Fred Duckels 3 years, 10 months ago
Steve, is this the dagger in the heart of 700 that you denied being part of recently? You failed to get enough surrogates elected in the last election, I wonder why? Now you have decided that representative government is failing you, and plan B is called into service. This is all in your plan to shape this valley in the Community Alliance's image. Making the rules as you go seems to be vaguely familiar to the bullies handbook. I'm sure that allowing representative government to work will be fine when it suits your agenda. I thought that the community alliance was all for affordable housing, but it seems that it was merely a tool an end. These New York tactics seem to work for them, but we deserve better. In the west people have stood up to special interest groups with devious means, and we need to return this valley back to the character that attracted the folks that want to change everything.
greenwash 3 years, 10 months ago
So what is wrong with putting it to a Community vote?(other than waiting so long to do this).Seems to me to make sense being that it is so controversial.I support 700 but,but,but we have alot of unknowns to figure out.
Fred Duckels 3 years, 10 months ago
That is the job of the people that we elected to do that. Does the average voter know the history and input and facts to make an intelligent vote? Where do we draw the line on voting? Do the voters have council to keep us out of legal problems? We have planned this development long ago and everyone had a chance for input, the developer stepped in to help realize this dream and now we change our minds. Does this sound to you like someone that you would do business with. If we turn the 700 down we might just as well shut down planning and put every project to a vote. It's only fair.
greenwash 3 years, 10 months ago
OK I hear ya ...Let the dimwits decide for us.I guess its our own fault,electing a bunch of yahoos to represent us.Oh Well.
If the land is contiguous with town then let it be annexed,if not than they should wait.We have enough sprall already.
Steve Lewis 3 years, 10 months ago
Hold your horses Fred. The ballot question is not yet aimed at 700. It would likely take another petition to address a 700 approval.
I have not been a proponent of the 700 annexation going to ballot, for some of Fred's reasons. But the Sunday Pilot editorial's understating of the remaining fiscal hurdles is a red flag for me - a rush to judgment is always bad advice.
jeff roman 3 years, 10 months ago
when some one truly figures out what is truly afordable housing really means,we might start getting some where.(can the guys at the food markets or thelocal teachers really afford the current #s)
Requires free registration
Posting comments requires a free account and verification.
Or login with:
OpenID