Incidents lead to state audit, policy changes for drug task force

Advertisement

— A state audit and two embarrassing incidents involving the All Crimes Enforcement Team drug task force in the past year is leading to tightened procedures.

The audit, conducted by a Col­or­ado Bureau of Investigation agent, recommended that the task force update policies about how money for controlled drug buys is handled and when task force officers are allowed to drink alcohol while on undercover duty, among other po­l­icy changes. ACET and its commander, Ga­r­rett Wiggins, is overseen by a board composed of the directors of its member agencies: the Steamboat Springs Pol­ice Department, Craig Police Department, Moffat County She­r­iff’s Office, Hayden Police Department and the Fourteenth Judicial District Attorney’s Office. The Jackson County Sheriff’s Of­fice also is involved to a lesser degree.

Even before the changes, however, most members of the multi-county drug task force said they think the three-man ACET team has been successful in drug busts and prosecutions.

One prominent dissenter is Routt County Sheriff Gary Wall. In 2007, shortly after he took office, Wall pulled his department — and its funding — from the program, formerly known as the Greater Routt and Moffat Narcotics Enforcement Team.

Wall recently reaffirmed his decision to pull out of the program, citing problems with Wiggins and the program as a whole.

Wall cited the cases of the two former ACET members — Ken Johnson and Bob Brabo — prosecuted for crimes allegedly committed while working for the drug task force.

Johnson will go to trial in May on charges of attempting to influence a public servant, accessory to a crime and embezzlement of public property.

A former Craig Police Department detective, Joh­nson is accused of lying to police during an internal investigation about a relationship he had with a Craig woman, aiding that woman in violating her probation for drug charges, providing her with information about ongoing law enforcement investigations and giving her a laptop computer and other equipment used by ACET.

In early December, Brabo, also a former Craig Police Department officer, pleaded guilty to stealing $500 of ACET money. Brabo was assigned to ACET at the time of the theft.

In a letter critical of ACET and Wiggins that Wall sent to several local law enforcement agencies and the Steamboat Pilot & Today, Wall claims that Wiggins and the task force misuse their power.

“I think it’s awful to be spending public funds on an operation that operates that way,” he said.

Wiggins, reached by phone during the holidays, said Wall’s accusations are without merit.

“I read the letter obviously, and as usual, Gary Wall does not know all of the facts to each of the allegations that he’s making there,” he said.

Wiggins said he helped prosecute Johnson and Brabo when he discovered their suspected wrongdoing.

Wall’s letter also mentions the handling of the arrest and criminal case of Jorge Orduno-Acuna.

In Orduno-Acuna’s preliminary trial, Wiggins took the stand to testify about the amount of drugs seized in the investigation. Under cross-examination by Routt County Public Defender Sheryl Uhl­mann, Wiggins was unable to add up the amount of seized drugs listed in his report to meet the 450-gram threshold for one of the charges filed against the suspect.

District Attorney Elizabeth Ol­dham said it was a basic math error and that there was nothing hidden or misrepresented in the report. Wiggins said there also was a discrepancy between the gross weight and net weight and that the mistake was not malicious.

Wall doesn’t think Wiggins’ miscalculation was an accident.

“He knew exactly what he was doing,” Wall said.

The rancor between Wiggins and Wall extends at least since the 2006 sheriff’s election, when Wiggins was one of two Republican candidates for the position.

Steamboat Springs Police Chief J.D. Hays said he is frustrated with Wall’s accusations. Hays said the C.B.I. auditor said the task force was in order.

“I’m just tired of the nonsense,” Hays said, adding that he suspects Wall’s statements are politically motivated.

ACET is funded primarily through contributions from its member agencies. It has a $330,000 operating budget for 2010.

The task force primarily handles drug investigations and typically conducts 50 to 60 investigations a year.

In addition to revised money and alcohol policies, the ACET board has resumed weekly oversight meetings. Hayden Police Chief Ray Bi­rch, who is based the closest to ACET’s Hayden office, is a key component to those meetings.

“On the heels of the two incidents that have occurred in the past six months, they asked me to go there with the primary purpose of providing assistance to the task force commander, who at this time is Garrett Wiggins,” Birch said. “If he has a personnel issue, or if he has an issue that he thinks is of concern, he can share it with me.”

The author of the task force audit, Curt Williams, could not be reached during the holidays.

Comments

Scott Wedel 4 years, 11 months ago

I think the history of GRAMNET included many comical arrests and it had become an embarrassment.

I think ACET has stopped making comically bad arrests and has instead made a series of good arrests.

As for recent scandals, it appears that ACET was more of the solution than the problem. The Moffat Sheriff's dept missed all the signs, but the bad officer was caught by ACET. And ACET didn't let him resign, but prosecuted.

I think the Routt County Sheriff's dept is improved in the last couple of years and certainly has not had the any of the terrible stuff happen that was predicted when Gary Wall was elected. But Gary Wall sometimes picks poor battles to fight and he fails to present a coherent reason to criticize ACET under the command of Wiggins.

0

aichempty 4 years, 11 months ago

The results of the CBI "audit" should be interesting.

Where there's smoke, there's feu (that's fire, in French, pronounced "foo").

0

jerry carlton 4 years, 11 months ago

aichempty Is that medical maryjane smoke you are smelling?

0

14th_to_OAR 4 years, 11 months ago

"District Attorney Elizabeth Oldham said it was a basic math error and that there was nothing hidden or misrepresented in the report. Wiggins said there also was a discrepancy between the gross weight and net weight and that the mistake was not malicious"

This is what District Attorney Oldham always says when she's caught misrepresenting or withholding evidence. It's always a dumb little accident. So which is it, incompetence or corruption? And if the 450 gram bunk was not "malicious", why did DA Oldham go on to argue a ludicrous theory that materials in the house COULD have been used to get to 450. She should have done her duty and simply dropped the charge.

Oldham's a liar and a cheat, and that's proven here and during her time in Summit Cty.

0

Requires free registration

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.